vovat: (Minotaur)
I think I'm going to do a life overview sort of a post now. I was actually just considering recently how blogging became a lot more fun for me when I decided to treat it as less of a diary and more of an unofficial column. I've never been the type to keep a journal, possibly because I don't think I'm all that interesting on a personal level. I get the idea of wanting to collect your thoughts, but it's never worked that way for me. I see people saying their blogs are really for themselves but other people can read them, but I actively want others to read mine. The problem is that I don't know what anyone else finds interesting, so I guess it's more that I'm writing the kind of thing I'd want to read if somebody else were writing it, as trite as that might sound. And I do sometimes enjoy going back and reading my own writing, although that's probably rather self-involved. It seems weird at first that someone can be self-centered AND have low self-esteem, but it probably makes sense in that you're not going to particularly dislike yourself unless you think a lot about yourself. And I'm always concerned about things when writing that might not bother anyone else, like whether I'm covering the same topic too often or too many times in a row, and if I'm just duplicating information that can be found elsewhere.

But anyway, it's the Halloween season, and I'd kind of like to dress up this year, but for what? What's the point if nobody is going to see it? A lot of the ideas I come up with aren't really feasible anyway. On Saturday night, Beth and I went to the haunted events at Creamy Acres, which we hadn't done before even though it's been running for a while.

It seemed like it would have been difficult to fit in all six events, which are only available as a package deal. But really, they're mostly pretty short, and four of them are done in a row.

This cut-out makes me look like I did when I was in college.
Most of them are the sort of dark maze where it can be genuinely hard to find your way through, although usually the costumed characters will direct you if you need them to. On the hayride, we both took note of how obnoxious teenagers are. Maybe it's weird to say that when you're a childless adult still participating in events designed for kids, but I think it's more of a nostalgic thing for people like us. Teenagers seem to be at the stage where it's no longer scary for them, but instead of just going along with it they feel the need to make snide comments to make it clear they're NOT scared, as if anybody cares. I'm sure it's not ALL teenagers, but it seems particularly common for that age group. Or maybe I'm just a cranky old man, but I feel like I was one of those even when I was a teenager.

On Sunday, my sister-in-law had her baby shower, and my brother wasn't there. I always got the impression that baby showers were all-female events, but Beth has been to some where there were men in attendance, and there's really no reason why they shouldn't be that I can see. But what ended up happening was that I drove Beth there, and then my dad, my sister-in-law's dad, and I sat in the backyard during the games and gift-opening. I liked their dog, although she did keep growling at me when I stood up.

I don't know when I'm going to be able to see my new nephew, but I believe he's due in late November or so. After the shower, Beth and I ate at Friendly's, then drove up to Brooklyn.

Contents of the claw machine at Friendly's
As usual, it took me forever to find a parking space, although I did appreciate that the DJ on WFUV played some George Formby songs and discussed the Bonzo Dog Band. He played the original version of "Jollity Farm" and its predecessor "Misery Farm." I might have to check out Songs the Bonzo Dog Band Taught Us.

The temp agency originally told me my job was going to end last week, but it was extended, and now I don't know when it's supposed to end. I guess that's true for just about any job, though, isn't it?
vovat: (wart)
I'm writing in my LiveJournal again, although I'm not entirely sure why. Old habits die hard, I guess. The other day, I was upset because the links on a post I had written for WordPress weren't working, and [livejournal.com profile] bethje and I had to leave. She pointed out that no one is waiting around for my posts, which I'm sure is true. I just WISH they were. Seriously, does anyone know how to expand the audience for a blog, or is the whole format pretty much dead now? I'm thinking more of WP than LJ, since not only is the latter pretty vacant, but most of what I write is just about my life. I would imagine the WP would have more general interest, although even with that I usually stick to a few topics. I just want to be appreciated! Is that so bad? Well, maybe not, but I think there's more need for appreciation in the world than there is appreciation to go around. I know some people really just blog for themselves, and that's a factor for me, just I do like writing. It's just that I'd also like to have an audience. I'm also wondering if I should keep my Flickr account, which is up for renewal in a few days. I guess I will, since I like their format, but technically I could probably just post all my pictures on Facebook for free. I don't know what their storage limit is.

So what's new? Beth and I did a few hours of dog-sitting on Thursday. We have dogs in South Jersey, but just the cats up here; and this dog was much better behaved than ours. She mostly just lay in bed. The cats are used to dogs, and Wally greeted her, while Reagan mostly just ignored her. Last night, we went to see the Kids in the Hall for their encore show at Town Hall in Manhattan. It was the same as the show we'd seen there a few months ago, but it was the last night of the tour, so the Kids hammed it up a lot more than usual. There were also some technical problems, with Dave Foley's microphone cutting out from time to time during the country doctor sketch and Mark McKinney screwing up with his camera in the Headcrusher bit. That kind of made it more interesting, though. Before the show, we ate at a diner near the subway that closed at 8 PM on a Friday night. I'll never understand the hours of some of the places around here.

Today, Beth and I were going to go to the Coney Island Mermaid Parade, but she was too tired, so I went by myself. I was pretty tired as well, but it's something I've been wanting to do for some time. It's definitely an interesting experience, as it mixes nearly-naked women, cross-dressing men, and parents with costumed kids. Something for everybody, I suppose. I took a lot of pictures, and most of them came out pretty well.
Post-Parade 2.JPG
no title
no title
no title
I took a few pictures after the parade as well, but I'm usually more nervous about that unless I see someone else doing the same thing first. For some reason, I often think I'd get along with people who dress in costumes, but even though they're obviously trying to attract a certain amount of attention, they're really just like all the other huddled masses in the New York streets. I guess I'm not the only one, as there's been a lot of talk recently about how cosplay is not consent.

Not that I'm planning to ask anyone out or feel them up, but the principle is the same. Someone did say he liked my shirt, which is the one from Nintendo World with all the characters from the first Super Mario Bros. game. You know what would be cool for a future parade? If I could get some Oz fans together to wear costumes related to L. Frank Baum's The Sea Fairies. There could be an Aquareine and a Zog, and King Anko would be suspended on sticks like a Chinese dragon. I doubt it will ever happen, though. I wonder if there have been any Baum-inspired costumes there in the past.

Finally, I have to go to New Mexico tomorrow, so I probably won't be blogging for a while. I'll still try to update Twitter and Facebook, though.
vovat: (Bowser)
Great, I'm being beset by trolls over on my WordPress. Look at the comments on this post, for example. Then there's this one, which is even more bizarre. At least Xmas Boy's comments relate to the posts, even if they're totally ridiculous. This Lynn person used a post about Chick Tracts to rant about radical Islam. What, does this mean stupid little comics are our last line of defense against Al Qaeda? The problem is, I'm bad at dealing with trolls, because I kind of encourage them. Instead of just leaving their comments alone, I figure I might be able to get them to see a different point of view, and if not at least an argument with them would be funny. And it IS somewhat funny in retrospect, but at the time it's rather stressful. Part of the problem is that, when they start making personal attacks, I begin to wonder if that really IS how people see me. I'm just too sensitive to being disliked, I suppose. Of course, there's no way to win with such people, which is what makes them trolls. There seems to be a sort of link between trolling and fundamentalism, and I don't even necessarily mean religious fundamentalism. About eight or nine years ago, I spent way more time than I should have arguing with some guy on an Oz e-mail list. To his credit, he was really quite enthusiastic about the topic. Despite this guy's proudly announcing he was an atheist, however, he had the same approach to the Oz books that Christian fundamentalists do to the Bible. His interpretation was the only right one, and certain quotes that he pulled out had to be taken entirely literally. It's so frustrating, because I WANT people to feel free to disagree with my posts. If you're not even open to any other views, however, why even bother commenting? Just to be annoying?

Okay, let's get off that topic for a little while, and turn to one that's less controversial, Nintendo cartoons! You know, because everyone agrees they're not very good.


King Scoopa Koopa - Oh, holy cannoli, it's a message episode. I don't mind when there are lessons in a show, but it really helps when they don't hit you over the head with them, like they do in this one. Bowser opens Scoopa Koopa's Fast Food, a restaurant that serves chickadactyl egg sandwiches (a chickadactyl, in case you couldn't guess, is a sort of a combination between a chicken and a pterodactyl, which appears only in this cartoon), papaya fries, and coconut shakes. Several dinosaurs work in the kitchen, with Dino-Rhinos doing the cooking. Not only is the food fattening and addictive, however, but the sandwiches slowly turn those who eat them into chickadactyls themselves. Since Mario doesn't like eggs and the Princess refuses to touch any of the food, they're both unaffected, and try to shut down the restaurant. The customers and employees give chase, with Mario and Peach having to use the Star Road to get away. Eventually, after an encounter with a Rip Van Fish, they end up in the cavern where Scoopa Koopa's dumps their garbage. Mario finds a Cape Feather, and uses its power to drive out King Koopa and his cooks. He then tells the cave people to go home and eat some vegetables. So there's your lesson, kids: fast food is bad for you, because it can turn you into a chicken. Too bad this was quite likely followed by a McDonald's commercial when it aired on television.

Battle of the Baseball Know-It-Alls - Hey, remember how insane it was when Larry Bird showed up in "In Pursuit of the Magic Hoop"? Well, here's another gratuitous appearance by a sports star, Bo Jackson, who had a Nintendo game around this time. Actually, Bo and the "Bo knows" catch phrase were all over the place when this show first aired. If I remember correctly, the show following this one was a cartoon called Pro Stars. I never watched it, but I know Bo was a character on there as well. I doubt he did his own voice in either show, though. Anyway, Bo is stuck into Captain N continuity as the captain of the Videoland All-Stars and an inhabitant of Baseball World, which is quite possibly the place where Princess Lana visits a Videoland version of Yankee Stadium back in "Mega Trouble for Megaland." Bo is playing a game against the N Team, and I actually mean the entire N Team for once in this season, although Lana and Game Boy are on the sidelines. This is also the only episode this season with Mother Brain making an appearance, and she looks even more off-model than the other characters.

Seriously, she doesn't even have her tentacles anymore. She and her goons rewire a warp to send Bo and the N Team inside Baseball World, where there's a cellar full of sentient and nasty baseball equipment that they have to fight. One point of interest in this rather stupid set-up is that Mega Man uses a buzzsaw to defeat some bats. I've always wondered if that was supposed to be the Metal Blade from Mega Man 2. Granted, it doesn't fly off in different directions, but it's probably close enough for this show. Meanwhile, Mother Brain takes control of the palace, and we get a somewhat amusing scene where King Hippo brushes his teeth with a toothbrush that he and Eggplant Wizard had been using to clean the floor. Lana manages to open a warp zone out of the Baseball World cellar, but since it leads from the bottom of a gulf to the ceiling of the palace, she tricks the Brain's henchmen into making a giant cake for the N Team to land on. Mother Brain, King Hippo, and Eggplant Wizard end up inside Baseball World, and that's the last we see of them. No, seriously. I have to suspect they escaped eventually, because it would have been pretty lame for that to be the ultimate fate of the show's main villains, but we never see this. I'm not sure why the makers of these cartoons were so adverse to season finalés, but there you go. Anyway, while the last thing this season needed was ANOTHER episode based on a sports game, I think the writers made more of an effort with this one than with the basketball one. Also, the presence of Mother Brain was a plus.
vovat: (Default)
If there's one thing I can't complain about these days, it's not having enough to do. It's just that work and other obligations are always getting in the way, and when I'm at home all I generally want to do is sleep and write blog posts. I guess that's something, though. I just wish I received more feedback. It's not like I pour my heart and soul into every post (more like my black bile and skin flakes), but I do write about things I think are interesting, and wish more people would share my interest. I guess that's what happens when you have oddly specialized interests. Anyway, things I probably should do in the near future include:

  • Work on editing my Oz stuff, and hopefully get some of it published. It seems easier to do that now, what with print-on-demand and all that, but I'm still not sure exactly how to accomplish it. I have three basically-finished longer manuscripts, and I'm more or less satisfied with one of them, which is actually the one I churned out rather quickly. The one that took me years to complete still needs some changes, but I'm not sure whether the most recent changes I've been contemplating are for the better or not, since they add complications to the plot.
  • Clean this room, at least as much as I'm able. That's something I should probably do in stages, which is how I often do things I don't find all that pleasant, and even sometimes things I enjoy. I'm never really sure where good stopping points are, though, and leaving it too long often means I generate more mess.
  • Apply for jobs. (Yuck.)
  • Check out some of the DVDs and video games that I've had sitting around for a while. I wouldn't say that's exactly productive, but it makes me feel bad that there's stuff I specifically asked for some time ago and I still haven't gotten around to even opening it.


Anyway, here's a survey I got from [livejournal.com profile] poisonyoulove:
Read more... )
vovat: (Autobomb)
I have a bad habit of assuming that, if someone doesn't get back to me right away, it's because I've done something to offend them. I realize this is ridiculous, especially considering that I'll often take upwards of a week to respond to comments and such. So I'm both paranoid and hypocritical, I suppose. Really, though, there have been times when I think I really DID offend someone to the point they didn't want to talk to me anymore. Back when I was in college, there was one girl who liked my web page and exchanged e-mails with me a few times, but stopped when she said she was joining a sorority and I said they came across as pseudo-communist organizations. Probably not the smartest thing to say, but I still kind of feel that way. I remember when I was doing some preparation work for a church book sale, and some sorority girls were also helping out, and there was just a real sameness to all of them. You know how, in A Wrinkle in Time, the people of Camazotz don't look identical, but they're all somewhat the same, and it turns out that they all share one giant brain? That's basically how sororities come across to me. Maybe not all of them, but it's what comes to my mind. But I digress. Also, a few years ago, somebody added me on LJ but then suddenly removed me a few months later, and when I asked about it she said something about how I was mean to her friends. The main thing I can remember arguing with her friends about, though, was how I think "natural cures" are most often bunk. I'm sure I could have been more tactful in both situations, but it still confuses me a little. It's not like I was being personally insulting, at least as far as I could tell. And anyone who's been reading my journal for a while knows that I often criticize religion, but if anyone religious has stopped following me because of that, they really kept it on the down-low. So what I've gathered is that it's fine to bad-mouth people's deeply held convictions about the very nature of life and the universe, but not to point out that herbal supplements are highly unlikely to cure cancer. Good to know, I guess.

[livejournal.com profile] bethje and I had a bit of a delay in watching last Sunday's cartoon lineup, but we finally did on Wednesday night. I really don't have much to say about the Simpsons episode, which just struck me as kind of trite. While plot lines based on a character discovering a hidden talent have practically infinite possibilities, I think they're starting to get a bit overdone. This time, we find out Homer has a knack for cutting hair, and he opens his own salon. I was amused by Homer's reaction to the constant chatting, however. One thing I wondered was that, in the scene at Moe's when Homer starts remembering everyone's foibles, why does he have one for Ned Flanders? His wife is dead, remember? I think it did just say "stupid," though, so maybe Homer filled that in himself. Also, we get an interesting look at how Lisa is uninterested in Milhouse, but still gets jealous when he's dating someone else. That actually makes a certain amount of sense to me. In other cartoon-based discussion, is every American Dad from now on going to include jokes about how Principal Lewis is a lunatic? Not that I mind them, but I kind of wonder why they've been playing up the character's insanity so much as of late. And I have to give props to the Family Guy episode for being particularly creative. Since when did Leonardo da Vinci have children, though?

Yesterday, Beth and I trekked up to New York City so she could see Rufus Wainwright's tribute to his late mother Kate McGarrigle. I didn't go to the show, but I went along anyway so we could do a little exploring. Beth said she didn't recognize any of the songs from the show, and I wonder if I would have, as my dad had a Kate and Anna McGarrigle album. It was one of only a few cassettes in the car at the time, so I became quite familiar with it. For what it's worth, from what I remember, every song on there was depressing. Anyway, Beth has a thing about wanting to live in Midwood, a largely Jewish neighborhood in Brooklyn. She's told me several times that she's always wanted to be culturally Jewish, so I'm sure that's part of the reason. From our limited look at it, it really does look like a nice neighborhood, and not at all urban despite being in the city. They even had car dealerships, which isn't a selling point, but drives home just how different it is from other parts of New York City. We met [livejournal.com profile] therealtavie for dinner at the Heartland Brewery, and then joined up with Stephanie, who was going to the show with Beth. While they were there, I wandered around the Times Square area looking for a place I could rest and charge my phone, and could not find the latter. I thought Starbucks usually had outlets, but that's apparently not the case in that part of the city. I ended up ordering a smoothie at McDonald's, then sitting around and reading there for a few hours. Beth loaned me her spare battery, so I was able to keep my cell phone intact. Really, though, this is an issue I pretty much never see addressed, but which must come up. I always see people walking around the city talking on cell phones, and I know those batteries don't last forever. So where do they typically charge them? Or do they just not stay out long enough for the battery to die? I'm really quite curious, because when I'm on all-day excursions, I'm always afraid to use my phone for fear the battery will die on me.

All right, I guess that's it. Happy Friday the Thirteenth, everybody!
vovat: (Default)
Happy Martin Luther King Day! I suspect a good many are off from work today, as [livejournal.com profile] bethje is, so thank the Civil Rights Movement for that. {g} Actually, I'm off today as well, but not because it's a holiday. I just haven't been getting very many hours at Walmart recently, but apparently that's not just me. It's not like that dream I had last night where I cursed out a customer with a complicated order was true, after all.

Since I've already discussed my temporarily missing wedding ring, I can't say I have a whole lot to report about my life as of late. Trying to balance school, work, sleep, and leisure activities is a bit of a challenge, but I think it's been going all right. I have a case study to write for tomorrow, but it only has to be 750 words, so I don't expect it to take that long. On Saturday night, we went out to eat at Bob Evans, which I suppose really isn't worth mentioning. And no, I didn't have any sausage at that meal. It's good sausage, but doesn't work well in omelettes, as I found out a few years ago. Bob Evans is actually the only close sit-down restaurant that serves breakfast all day, now that the Denny's has closed down. There's always IHOP, but that's a little more of a drive.

When I first read the synopsis of last night's Simpsons episode, I really didn't think it sounded very good. We've seen several plots about Moe renovating his bar already, and he's mentioned the possibility of making it into a gay bar a few times as well. Even the title was basically a rehash: "Flaming Moe" instead of "Flaming Moe's." I think it actually worked out well, though. The plot actually went somewhere, and it was nice to see Moe and Smithers working together, since they don't get to interact a whole lot under normal circumstances. I appreciated that they included a callback to the previous changes to Moe's. I prefer it when they acknowledge that they're doing an unoriginal story. I guess if the show lasts much longer, Moe will eventually make his tavern into the milk bar from A Clockwork Orange. I liked the subplot with Principal Skinner dating the new music teacher as well, but the two really didn't intersect much at all. By the way, did anyone notice whether Scott Thompson's character in this episode was the same as the one in "Three Gays of the Condo," or has he now voiced two different stereotypically gay Springfield residents? Also, what was the song they played when Skinner met the music teacher?

I've been getting a lot of spam comments on my journal recently. Is there anything I can do about this? Maybe disallowing anonymous comments would help, since it's been a long time since I got a real comment from an anonymous author. I'm still not totally comfortable with the idea, however.
vovat: (Default)
It's been a little while since I've posted anything here, hasn't it? Even though work and school are both only part-time, they add up. And in the time not devoted to those things, I'm usually either sleeping or writing topic-specific posts for my other blog. Those are more interesting for me to write, but apparently not more interesting for people to read, based on the number of comments I get. I know that's not always a good way to judge, as people can like something and yet not have any reply to it, but part of what I'm doing with my posts is trying to generate discussion. If none is forthcoming, then I get a little disappointed. I was kind of hoping the WordPress would bring in more people who don't have LiveJournal accounts, but most of those who comment there are also friends here. Not that I don't appreciate having loyal readers, mind you! Sometimes the topic-specific posts seem a bit pointless, in that I really don't have anything new to say about most of them, so I'm just summarizing information that can be found elsewhere on the Internet. I like to think I write about them in an interesting way, but it still sometimes feels futile. I guess I'M always learning new things, though, so that counts for something, as trite as that sounds.

Anyway, as I mentioned, I'm back in school. I've noticed that people tend to react with cheers when an adult goes back to school, but sometimes I wonder what's so great about it. It costs money, involves a lot of work, and doesn't necessarily pay off at the end. I guess I'm kind of bitter, because I already have a master's degree, and it doesn't seem to have helped me that much. I want to try to be more conscientious about finishing my work and looking into outside opportunities this time around, but that latter item especially isn't really in my nature. I do what's required of me as a student, but I feel awkward trying to make connections. I guess we'll have to see what happens. I'm taking two classes, one on campus and one online, and the latter is a new experience for me.
vovat: (Default)
Mother's Day, eh? I called my mom last night to wish her a happy one, but she never returned my call. I really should visit her at some point, since it's been a while and it's not like she lives that far away. I am bothered that [livejournal.com profile] bethje doesn't want to go with me, though. Today, we went out to Applebee's with Beth's mom. I think we had the same waitress we did last time we went there, but Beth denies it, even though she said she remembered us. (Beth's mom wasn't there the last time, but she, Uncle John, and I were.) Whether it was the same person or not, though, I thought she was cute. I guess it's possible that Applebee's has two cute waitresses, though, right?

As for TV, I think The Simpsons is at its best nowadays when they try something kind of different with an episode, and this one actually did a good job with an unusual arrangement. I guess the flashbacks to recent times were sort of like "Eternal Moonshine of the Simpson Mind," but adding in Moe as the omniscient narrator was a clever touch. I also enjoyed how they were able to come up with a story involving characters who don't interact all that much in most episodes. Also nice to see the Parson again, and get a brief appearance by Jessica Lovejoy. I do have to wonder whether this was originally intended as a Mother's Day episode, or they just stuck in some extra voiceover from Moe and the montage of pictures at the end upon learning that it was going to air today.

Family Guy was pretty interesting, in that we actually got a bit of character development and family history. I do kind of agree with a comment Beth made, however, about how TV characters are always so freaked out about discovering someone is gay. I think we might be the unusual ones in this case, though. And with American Dad, while I'm somewhat squeamish when it comes to poop-related humor, I thought Stan becoming a laughing stock and moving to increasingly ridiculous places made for a good plot. Of course, it turned out to be a fantasy sequence, even though he's done equally absurd things in other episodes. I did start to suspect something like that once Klaus died, however.

Finally, I know when I mentioned the possibility of switching over to a different blogging site, there were some people who didn't care for the idea. If you're one of these people, which entries do you usually read? I've been thinking I should use my WordPress blog for topic-specific posts and this for more personal matters, but would that mean some of you are missing out on stuff you might want to see?
vovat: (Bowser)
I'm most likely not doing a video game post this week, unless I think of something while I'm at work. I've been known (well, known by myself, anyway) to plan out posts pretty much word for word while working, although of course they don't come out exactly the same when I actually write them. The Mushroom Guru posts were fun, but I've largely run out of ideas, and I can only recall receiving two comments on them anyway. Am I using the wrong forum, or were they just not funny? Either is possible, but it's difficult to tell when no one leaves feedback. And when I make comments like that, it's pretty much always people who comment on other posts anyway who leave a reply like, "Oh, I'm sorry. I've been busy recently." While I definitely appreciate your replies, I'm really not talking to you, but to anyone reading this who NEVER comments. Then again, maybe there aren't any people in that category. I don't know. While I'll probably keep using LiveJournal for posts about my life, is there a better place for my creative experiments and observations on religion and mythology? And if so, would it be possible for me to an RSS feed on LJ, so people who DO like this format would be able to read them without going somewhere else? I feel like I've asked these same basic questions many times, and while I've gotten answers, they've never really been enough to go on. Really, that's mostly my fault, though. I'm just not sure where to get started.

Anyway, I originally wasn't going to make a post at all today, but then I came across this article. Aren't you glad that ridiculous bigotry is still alive and well? Because I'm not, but it looks like someone must be. [livejournal.com profile] bethje had told me earlier about Constance McMillen not being able to bring her girlfriend to her prom, and how when the ACLU got involved, the school just canceled the prom entirely. Well, they apparently settled the issue by holding a small event for Constance and her date that only four other people attended, while other students attended a separate prom. I wondered for a minute why anyone would have attended the separate prom knowing the prejudice that went into the decision, but then I remembered that we're talking about high school students here. The article touches on how cruel an environment high school is for anyone who's different in pretty much any way, and how the schools rarely do anything to prevent this. In fact, in this case, we have the school coming right out and saying, "Hooray for homophobia!" Doesn't it figure that this school would be in Mississippi, and have "agricultural" in its name? Does a state that's stereotyped so much by the rest of the country really want to perpetuate the stereotypes? Come on, if you're portrayed as marrying your first cousins and having five kids by the time you're sixteen, it's probably not a good idea to marginalize anyone else for their sexual identity. Obviously the redneck stereotypes aren't true for most people either, but this school and its students certainly aren't helping matters. Oh, and of course there are also bigots leaving comments on the article, yakking about the "gay agenda." First of all, this is a phrase that you obviously took from someone else, meaning you're just parroting another person's thoughts. And really, if you want to talk about agendas, which is more of one? Wanting to have the same civil rights as everyone else, or working hard to overturn that pesky separation of church and state?
vovat: (Default)
As I've said before, I'm probably going to get my own Web domain soon. Knowing me, "soon" might well mean in a year or so, but it's definitely in the works. If I manage to get that set up, I'll have one more venue for posting stuff, and I'm wondering how you readers would prefer to see my updates. Also, I was thinking today about how I'll often post links to my LJ posts in other places, like Facebook and Tumblr. Does anyone actually follow the links from these other sites, or am I just wasting my time in doing so? Not that it takes much time, mind you; I guess I'm more concerned about wasting YOUR time with links you have no intention of investigating. I'll generally only post an LJ update to Twitter if I think it will be of particular interest to one or more people that I know read that. I guess I see my LJ as currently being my main writing repository, with the other social networking sites being secondary. But is that necessarily true? I'm pretty sure there are people who read my Twitter updates but not my LJ posts. And Tumblr is another kettle of fish entirely, as I'm more likely to add people there when I don't know them at all, as long as I like the pictures they're posting. If you're reading my LJ, you can see everything I put on Twitter, but I've seen some people say that they purposely avoid tweet-collecting posts. I've considered removing my replies from those posts, as they often make no sense out of context, but as nobody said anything when I suggested it, I didn't bother.

I'm also interested in attracting more traffic to what I write, but I'm not sure there are really too many people interested in it. After all, most of the information I include is readily available online, so the main thing you'd get out of reading my posts is my own spin on various subjects. And is that really something that people who have no idea who I am want to see? Maybe I'm underestimating myself, though. It does seem like most of the blogs I read that get high traffic and large amounts of comments are topic-specific. Still, there are some personal blogs I follow that seem to attract more comments from people who stumbled across the page than my LJ (and perhaps anyone's LJ) does. So what is it that makes a blog more successful? Is it content? Format? Writing style? How it's indexed on search engines? Maybe it's a combination of those things, but I don't really know.

Anyway, here's a poll you can answer:
[Poll #1532448]
vovat: (zoma)
1. Online Presence and Future - Between this journal, Twitter, Facebook, and Tumblr, it can sometimes be a bit of a challenge deciding where to address a certain topic. Really, I don't use Facebook much except to link to stuff I've written elsewhere, as I find the interface rather overly complicated. On the other hand, that's where I have the most followers, so there's no accounting for tastes. I use Tumblr pretty much exclusively for pictures and videos, although I'll occasionally throw in a link or a brief text post. Twitter is for brief observations (as it pretty much has to be by its very nature; I actually kind of like the fact that it prevents me from being unnecessarily verbose), and this journal is for a real mishmash of stuff. Lately, I've been writing more topic-specific posts (Oz, mythology, video games, etc.) than personal stuff here on LJ, and I have to wonder if it's really the best medium for that. It's convenient, but [livejournal.com profile] bethje has said she suspects people tend to see "LiveJournal" and think it's going to be someone whining about their relationships (which I do do, but not quite as often). She and some other people have suggested getting my own domain, but I have to admit I have no clue how to do that, or how to work with it when I do have it. I know some people have blogs (i.e., movable type) on sites that aren't specifically tailored for it (like LiveJournal, Blogspot, Wordpress, etc.), so I know it's very possible, but I don't know how to arrange such a thing. And does anyone think I'd actually get more traffic that way, or would it just be a waste of money? I'm looking for input here, people!

2. iPod So You Don't Have To - I've been considering getting a new MP3 player, since my current one is now about four years old. It still plays, but it has occasional problems, and it's probably better not to wait until it conks out entirely. I currently have a Creative player, and I like it, but I don't think they make any with much storage capacity these days. I know some of the iPod Classics can store a lot of music, but is it true that you can only use those with one computer? I've heard that, if you plug an iPod into someone else's computer, it will erase all of the stored data. Is this true, and if so, is there any way to get around it?

3. This Is Not Really an Item - I already mentioned this on Twitter, but I thought I'd elaborate on how ridiculous I found it when an eHarmony commercial insisted that it WASN'T a dating site. Their explanation for this was that it was a match-making site, or something like that. I forget the actual phrase they used, but it was something that sounded suspiciously like a dating site to me. It reminded me of something I first read in a Chick Tract and later heard from other fundamentalists, which is that Christianity isn't a religion, but a relationship with God. I don't think any of them have been able to sufficiently explain what the difference is, though. Is saying things aren't what they pretty obviously are a growing trend?

4. Brangelina Blues - Well, I've now heard about 80,000 times from various media that Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie are breaking up, although they officially deny it. Wow, what a shock! You know, if you get shocked by really obvious things. ("Oh, wow! Grass is GREEN!") Didn't Brad cheat on Jennifer Aniston with Ms. Jolie in the first place? Not that I really blame him for that one, since at least Angelina is somewhat interesting. Ms. Aniston has to be one of the dullest people in the entertainment business, yet somehow she keeps appearing on magazine covers. The story usually seems to be something like "Jen upset over break-up," which I suppose is news because people who didn't star in Friends just LOVE breaking up. But anyway, my point is that I never figured either Brad or Angelina for the type who goes for stable relationships.

5. Haitian Satan - An interesting post I read today puts Pat Robertson's moronic comments about Haiti into context. Apparently the idea that the Haitians are in league with the Prince of Darkness is nothing new, because some Christians assume that Voodoo rituals must be Satanic. Yes, we're back to the idea that every god other than yours has to be the Devil in disguise, as if Satan really has that much free time. As the article mentions, Christianity itself was subject to that sort of slur in its early days. I can't say I believe in any of these gods, but I always kind of liked the ancient Roman notion that having more gods would strengthen the state. Really, I think paganism would work out well in today's society, because as it is we have hundreds of different interpretations of the same deity. If you really want a violent deity, why bother insisting that the notorious pacifist Jesus would have been cool with guns? Just become a devotee of a war god (Ares/Mars, Tyr, Mithras, etc.), and you can easily mix your pro-war stance with your religious fanaticism! Also, I think I might do an article on Voodoo mythology in the near future, as I don't know a whole lot about it and it sounds interesting. I do know one of their gods (or loa, anyway) is a skeleton in a top hat, and how can you go wrong with that?
vovat: (Minotaur)
Is there a trick to getting celebrities to reply on Twitter? Yeah, I'm sure there isn't, but I'm still kind of amazed that I've received two replies from Amanda Palmer, who has 192,162 followers. The occasional reply to a fan is actually a really clever marketing technique, though. Even if you only reply every once in a while, it presents the illusion of actual conversation. I guess Amanda has always tried to maintain a good rapport with her fans, but I think it could also work for less sociable celebrities.

The constant changes to the Facebook interface just reinforce what I've pretty much thought from the first, which is that it's SUPPOSED to be confusing. It's chaos with small bits of order, which is the worst kind of chaos (except possibly the end boss of the first Final Fantasy). I have more contacts on Facebook than any other site, yet I check and update it considerably less than I do LiveJournal, Twitter, or Tumblr. I do try to link to my more interesting LJ entries, but I'm not sure how many people go here from there, although I know a few have.

This past weekend, I read through the archives of Questionable Content. I'm pretty sure I'd seen it linked from various communities before, what with its plethora of references, but I'd never read it with any regularity before. I'm actually kind of pleasantly surprised at how much I liked the characters; as bizarrely exaggerated as some of them are, they seem like people I'd want to hang out with. Too bad they're, y'know, fictional. That's the story of my life, though. As much as I love the magic, humor, and weirdness in the Oz books, a large part of their appeal for me (especially in my junior high years) was always how accepting the fairyland was of characters who didn't fit in elsewhere.

Speaking of web comics, Captain SNES has FINALLY resolved the standoff between Alex and the Sinistrals, and Chaos has shown up in 8-Bit Theater. Now that latter one is a comic where I DON'T want to hang out with the cast, as amusing as they might be. Too much chance of being stabbed or Hadokened. {g}
vovat: (Default)
So, LiveJournal is cool in many ways, but I've been thinking (partially at the behest of [livejournal.com profile] bethje) that I should get my own domain for blogging. I'm not entirely sure what I'd call it, though. The obvious "vovat.com" and "nathandehoff.com" aren't really all that memorable, so I'd welcome any suggestions you might have. I guess I'd mostly want to use the site for my more scholarly posts, although I'm not sure whether I'd count the Oz stuff in that category or not. I mean, I guess it's scholarly, but does it have much mass appeal? I don't know.

One thing I do like about LiveJournal is that there's somewhat of a captive audience. Sure, you can skip my posts, but if you use the friends page you're at least aware that I've written something. Of course, you can now subscribe to a feed of pretty much any blog on Google Reader or a similar application, but is it as common? What I don't really like about LJ is that, while the commenting system is convenient for anyone who has an account, it really isn't for anyone else. And there's the whole image thing, with a memorable domain name probably being more likely to attract new viewers than a LiveJournal page. Any other thoughts on the matter? I don't plan to avoid LJ entirely, but I would like for people other than my LJ friends to read some of my stuff (assuming any of them are interested).
vovat: (Woozy)
[Error: unknown template qotd]

Probably [livejournal.com profile] bethje, although I know I added every LJ person I remembered from the TMBG Off-Topic List pretty much immediately. And yes, they're all still there. I'll generally only remove someone if they either delete their journal or remove me first.

So, it's the fifteenth of May (in the Jungle of Nool?), which means it's the one hundred fifty-third birthday of the late Lyman Frank Baum, my favorite author and possessor of one of my favorite mustaches.



In honor of Baum's birthday, check out this post by Jared Davis. The podcast you can download from there includes me, reading a chapter from The Emerald City of Oz. I haven't listened to the whole podcast yet, but I'll admit that I probably read a little too fast. From what I can remember, that's been the case since kindergarten. I also can't do voices, but I at least tried to use appropriate tones. You can let me know whether you think I succeeded.

And finally, some quiz results. )
vovat: (Default)
You know, I hadn't even heard of Twitter until [livejournal.com profile] 3x1minus1 mentioned it, but I've seen it mentioned quite a bit lately, often in a negative context. I was a bit apprehensive about it at first, what with the word limit and all. I have, as you may have noticed, a bit of a tendency toward verbosity. But I've since found it a useful repository for the thoughts I have during the day that I'd like to share with others, but don't feel like working up a LiveJournal post about. I have to wonder if part of Twitter's image problem is due to its tagline being "What are you doing?", which sounds both narcissistic and dull. More often, the questions I answer are closer to "What are you thinking?" or "What are you observing?", which only fall into the "doing" category in a broad sense. Of course, as I'm sure I've mentioned before, I don't usually use my LiveJournal as an actual JOURNAL, either. Sure, I do sometimes, but a lot of the time I think of it more as a sort of amateur op-ed column.
vovat: (Default)
Wow, there's been a sudden influx of people I know from college on Facebook. Not sure if anyone I added there will follow my links here, but if you do, salutations from Stratovania! I try to write about a little bit of everything, so if you've been turned off by my recent Oz and video game posts, there might well be something more interesting coming up soon. Or maybe not.

Something I was thinking about recently is how I don't necessarily mind pretentiousness in comedy. I mean, Tom Lehrer had a kind of pretentious manner, and I love his work. Of course, he was also self-deprecating, quoting his own bad reviews and all, which helps. [livejournal.com profile] bethje used to watch the late-night shows quite often, and she said that one reason she much preferred Letterman and Conan to Leno was that the former two made fun of themselves, while the latter seemed to think rather highly of himself. What I think does tend to bug me is smugness, and I came across a good example of this when I last watched The O'Reilly Factor. Dennis Miller appears on his show pretty much every week, and man, that guy is smug. He'll make...well, not even really a joke, but just a reference to something kind of obscure, and then sit there as if saying, "That's right, I know what that is!" I really didn't see much of Dennis during his liberal days, but I get the feeling his style of comedy was much the same. On the show, he made a reference to some hockey player (I forget the name, but I think he played for the Seahawks), and O'Reilly totally indulged him, saying something like, "Hardly anyone will get that!" But wait, doesn't that mean it's not a very good joke? Yes, jokes that not a lot of people are going to get have their place, because they make those who DO get them feel like they belong. But it seems like you'd have to have a fair number of people on the inside to make such a line worthwhile. I don't know. I make a lot of obscure references myself, but not so much to show off my own knowledge as because a lot of things remind me of stuff that I know well, and others might not.

Along the same lines, I mentioned in that same earlier post (I'm getting a lot of mileage out of that entry, aren't I?) that I thought Festivus displays might potentially ruin the joke. The thing is, no one who hasn't seen the Seinfeld episode is going to think it's funny. I feel much the same way when people bring up forty-two being the answer to life, the universe, and everything. I'm a big Douglas Adams fan, but that bit really isn't that amusing outside of context. References like that work sort of like computer subroutines, in that they remind people of something else that was funny, rather than being funny on their own.

And to get back to that happiness meme, what's making me happy today is the prospect of going out to dinner. I still haven't quite decided where, but I'm leaning somewhat toward the Olive Garden.
vovat: (Default)
I got this from [livejournal.com profile] pixielust:
Ooh, controversial! )

By the way, you know one thing I don't know that I'll ever understand? LJ users removing other people from their friends lists with no explanation. It's happened to me a few times, and I'm probably oversensitive about it. But I'm terrified of rejection, and that's part of why I usually won't add anyone to MY friends list unless they add me first, or we've had some prior back-and-forth commenting. If you have a problem with someone, why can't you just TELL them? And if it's a matter of not wanting people you don't really know to see certain posts (which I can totally understand), isn't that why custom groups were invented?
vovat: (Bast)
I'm thinking I might want to do some kind of ongoing series of posts, but I'm always afraid that kind of thing will bore people. Yeah, I know it's my journal and I can write what I want, but when I write something kind of involved and no one seems interested, I feel like it was somewhat of a waste. So I'm going to ask for your input on a few ideas I've had recently. I've actually brought a few of them up before, but I'm going to mention them again. So there.

1. Reminiscence on stuff I wrote when I was a kid, especially my space stories from late elementary school. I don't know where most of them are, and the ones that I DO know about are in storage, but I can remember quite a bit.

2. Ongoing TV reviews. Right now, I'd probably want to do that with Captain N, since I just got the DVD set, but there are other old shows I might want to do that with. The Mario cartoons, for instance. What can I say? Nintendo-based cartoons were an important part of my childhood.

3. Along the same lines, reviews of old albums. I try to say a bit (or sometimes a lot) about new albums I get, but it might be fun to go back and examine old ones. I think looking back at They Might Be Giants and XTC albums would be fun.

4. Reviews of the traditional Oz books. Actually, I think it would be interesting to do this as a video series, but I don't have a webcam. It can't cost that much to get one nowadays, though, can it?

5. Something to do with mythology. I haven't really thought this one out too much, but maybe a Myth of the Week, or Mythological Character of the Week, or something like that.

Would any of you be interested in any of those things? If so, vote in this poll!

[Poll #1257238]
vovat: (Bowser)
I was supposed to see a dermatologist today, but it turned out they never got the referral from the regular doctor, even though I called the office about it the other day. The particularly annoying thing is that the doctor's office was right around the corner, but they wouldn't let me go over there to ask about the referral. Apparently they couldn't see me if I showed up too long after the appointment time, even though I actually came into the office ten minutes EARLY, and that was after sitting in the parking lot and reading for a while. But apparently leaving the office and coming back somehow negates that, so I had to reschedule. Not a big deal, but you'd think this referral thing wouldn't be so difficult. I just had to sort another referral out with the insurance company, because I didn't realize exactly how it worked. But this time, I went about it the right way, and it still didn't work out.

Anyway, here are some memes regarding my LJ itself. I think I've done these before, but since they're subject to change, I felt I might as well do them again.

Read more... )
vovat: (Default)
I got this from [livejournal.com profile] annamatic. I remember doing a similar meme in the past, but this one has some different items on it, and I can't resist a good food-related survey.

1. Copy this list into your blog or journal, including these instructions.
2. Bold all the items you've eaten.
3. Cross out any items that you would never consider eating.
4. Optional extra: Post a comment here at very good taste.co.uk linking to your results.

The list is under here. )

This other survey, centered largely around reading and writing, comes from [livejournal.com profile] slfcllednowhere:
Read more... )

And this is totally unrelated, but it's a little annoying when I come up with a tag that would have worked well for earlier entries, like my "current events" tag on my last entry. I've already gone back and tagged earlier stuff twice now, though, and don't care to do it again.

April 2025

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
2021 2223242526
27 282930   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 13th, 2025 07:23 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios