vovat: (Victor)

Last weekend, the only major thing we did that I feel I need to write about was to attend a concert by the Brooklyn Chamber Orchestra. The theme this time was the Killer B's, meaning Beethoven, Bach, and Brahms. They also threw in a Wasp, specifically the overture from The Wasps, by Vaughan Williams. The Brahms piece was the Hungarian Dance, which I largely remember because of the Allan Sherman parody, although I like it anyway.

Really, it's a piece that speeds up and slows down so much that I would imagine it's difficult to actually dance to. They ended the show with a slow, solemn performance of Mussorgsky's "Great Gate of Kiev," dedicated to the people of Ukraine. Speaking of countries that had been part of the Soviet Union, we tried Georgian food for the first time on the day before that. Beth had recently found out about Acharuli Khachapuri, boat-shaped bread filled with melted cheese topped with an egg yolk, traditionally said to represent the sea and the Sun. When we got delivery, it came in a pizza box, and the egg had somehow spilled out. I don't know if that was my fault or someone else's, but I'll be sure to be more careful if we get that again. We shared an entree of chicken in garlic sauce. Georgia actually features in Greek mythology, as it's the location of the ancient land of Colchis, Medea's homeland. Apparently the ancient Greeks considered it the farthest place they could reach by ship.

Tuesday was our anniversary, sort of, since we were actually married on the twenty-ninth. It was also the day we saw Elton John on his Farewell Yellow Brick Road Tour, although that wasn't the original intention. Due to the pandemic, the show was delayed by quite a lot. Before the show, we got Japanese food. She had a Bento box, and I had shrimp yaki udon, which is stir-fried noodles. I found the noodles a little squishy, and I'm saying this as someone who's never particularly liked al dente pasta; but I still enjoyed it. I can't say I'm a big fan of sushi; obviously it varies, but I'm a picky eater and not accustomed to raw food like that. The show was at Barclays Center, and while I've walked by there many times, this is the first time either of us actually attended an event there. On the way there, we walked by a restaurant that was playing "Funeral for a Friend," which couldn't have been coincidental, right? Elton played that one and its followup, "Love Lies Bleeding," while his piano was moved around the stage.

I took a few pictures, but obviously we were too far back to see much of anything.

I was kind of surprised by how many people showed up late and left early, and got up during the show. I pretty much figure that, if you've paid for a concert, you should stay for the whole thing, unless you absolutely need to go to the bathroom or something. With how vertical stadium seating is, I wouldn't even think it was particularly safe to be moving around in relative darkness. It was a pretty long set, and there wasn't an opener or anything. He had spoken-word introductions for some of the songs. As part of the encore, he played his part of "Cold Heart," the song he did with Dua Lipa that includes part of "Rocket Man," along with a video. I remember hearing that on the radio once, but for the most part I'm not up on modern music. I guess I never really was. I assume Dua Lipa doesn't have anything to do with Duolingo, but you never know.
vovat: (Default)
It's Labor Day, and I get the day off even though I'm not at all a laborer. The long weekend has been pretty enjoyable, despite my general tendency to not want to do anything, my lingering cold, and the fact that my teeth sometimes feel itchy. I have no idea what's up with that last one. It's not real pain, just a weird, irritating feeling. And I don't think it's a dental issue, because it happened occasionally before the last time I went to the dentist, and they took about 50,000 X-rays and didn't notice anything wrong. Maybe it's a brain problem. I actually did something worth mentioning before the weekend, as Beth and I went to see a Kevin McDonald show in Times Square, where he told stories and sang songs, including a few I'd heard before at his podcast recordings. One of the songs was about being passive-aggressive, and one story involved an occasion in London when he was so scared seeing a hooligan beat up on a guy on a bike that his penis went inside his body. Is that an actual thing? Beth and I were both let out of work early on Friday, and we ate at Shake Shack, where we used to go a lot but haven't in a long time. I usually get two hot dogs instead of a burger. It seems like I always miss the more interesting limited time shake flavors, and end up getting strawberry, which is good but a little generic by this point. On Saturday, we ate at Standard Burger for the first time, and they have raspberry shakes. After that, we checked out something Beth had been reading about, step streets, which are streets extended through a really steep area by way of a staircase. Most of them are in the Bronx or northern Manhattan, but there are two in Brooklyn, on 74th and 76th Streets near the bay.



The one at 76th had graffiti all over it.


Those aren't even good drawings of dicks!

On Tuesday, we drove to Secaucus, where we lived for a few years before moving to Brooklyn. There's a trail there through Mill Creek Marsh that Beth enjoys, and we hadn't been there in a while.





Afterwards, we ate at the nearby Olive Garden. I can't say I have any particular plans for today, although I'll probably do the laundry. I really haven't been in much of a mood to write recently, which is part of why my WordPress entries have been sparse, but I'm also having trouble coming up with topics. There's some music I mean to write about, but I don't get much of a chance to listen to it, and when I do I can't think of what to say about it.

So much of what's been going on recently in the whimsical world of current events has been deeply disturbing, and while I guess it's nothing new, it seems like it's harder to ignore. I mean, I want to be aware of what's going on in the world, but I don't know that I necessarily need to know about every single white supremacist making idiotic comments. I feel that it's important to be aware of how dangerous people think, but it also seems like the media are giving too much of a platform to these idiots. I guess it's kind of hard not to when the President of the United States is one of them, but I really don't get why the mainstream media's reaction to Trump saying they're his enemies is to try their best to placate him. That's not how it's supposed to work even when the President ISN'T dangerously incompetent. I recently read this thread on Twitter about how the New York Times gradually became more right-wing due to the actions of conservative think tanks who tried to paint them as partisan. I'm not sure why anyone would think balance (which is basically just a way to present fringe ideas as equally valid) is more important than accuracy, but the media were just totally unprepared for the onslaught, and I think they were totally unprepared for a president like Trump as well. I mean, the media always cover what the President says and does, even if they don't agree with it. But sometimes we have to rethink what we've always done. I've been taking a certain amount of comfort in how many people there are who are willing to call out bigotry and general idiocy, but I'm also upset that they have to.
vovat: (Woozy)
Is outrage fatigue a thing? I have to suspect Trump and his followers are counting on it, because there's something terrible happening every day. There being two mass shootings this past weekend is disturbing as hell, but sadly not too shocking anymore. Not that Trump directly caused the shootings, but his racist rhetoric is empowering white supremacists. Maybe they're hoping we'll get desensitized to it. It is, however, not true that ICE was arresting people in the aftermath of the El Paso shooting. At this point, I can believe pretty much any racist thing happening. And there are still people blaming domestic terrorism on video games. Dudes, Space Invaders came out over forty years ago. You can't keep pretending they're something it's safe to blame for bad things because only the kids understand them.

As for what I personally have (or, in some cases, haven't) done recently, Beth saw Ben Folds with the Violent Femmes on Thursday, and I chose not to attend. I also turned down the chance to see Weird Al a few weeks ago, although that was the weekend it was unbearably hot, so I can't say I regret it. I just don't have the energy for concerts anymore. It helps when I buy tickets well in advance, so then it would be wasteful if I didn't go. I have tickets to see Robyn Hitchcock with Tanya Donnelly in November. He always seems to play in Brooklyn around my birthday, although I didn't go last year. For that one particular concert, though, I was still pretty tired after OzCon.

Meme by Erica Olivera, from a picture by John R. Neill
I did, however, go with Beth to see Michael Ian Black on Friday evening.

His opener was Maggie Rosenquist, who had a similar style of humor, very sarcastic.

Michael told his shaggy dog story about Subway, which I remember him doing at a different show a while back. He called the Italian BMT a "garbage sandwich," but that's what I often get there! But I do agree that saying the letters stand for "Big, Meaty, Tasty" is pretty gross (not to mention slightly pornographic), and I don't think I knew that before. It's actually named after the BMT subway line, which was sold to the city in 1940. I bought a Subway sandwich for tonight, and it's just ham. I don't get vegetables on my sandwiches like some kind of nineties sketch comedian.

On Saturday, Beth and I both slept until evening. Then someone who recently followed me on Instagram tried to convince me to have kids, which was pretty bizarre. It would be strange enough even if it were someone I actually knew. I can't recall there ever being a time when I wanted kids, and I'm pretty sure humanity will live on anyway, unless we all die of global warming or nuclear war. Beth and I had dinner at Pizzeria Uno, and she brought a little bit of lobster home for our cat Reagan, thinking it would be a special treat. Rea didn't even touch it. What the hell, cat? Here she is looking at me from the arm of the couch.
vovat: (zoma)
This past weekend was pretty eventful. On Friday evening, I went to see Cracker at City Winery. I believe it was advertised as an acoustic show, but while David Lowery did play an acoustic guitar, Johnny Hickman played an electric one. They were joined by a guy called Pistol on steel guitar. Most of the cheaper seats at the venue have obstructed views, and none of the pictures I took came out well, but it was still a lot of fun.

The set started with "Pitchforks and Torches," which David said had become much more relevant since he wrote it. I don't remember everything they played, but I'm pretty sure it was the first time I ever heard them do "Dr. Bernice" live. For some reason, somebody cheered after the line that mentions Karen Black. The stripped-down arrangement for "Teen Angst" was pretty cool as well. For the encore, they did a cover of "It Was a Very Good Year," then closed with "King of Bakersfield" because the first line mentions wine. I didn't have any wine at City Winery, but I did have mozzarella flatbread and Diet Coke. David has been in the news recently for his lawsuit against Spotify, which led to an article referring to him as a "cranky rocker" right in the headline. Funny, I know Taylor Swift didn't let Spotify use her catalog, and I don't recall anyone calling her cranky. It kind of reminded me of the recent Last Week Tonight bit about journalism, and how you can easily get news for free these days, but people still need to pay for newspapers in order for the journalists to be able to do their jobs. And I don't think it's fair to blame the consumers in such cases. Entertainment is expensive, so who isn't going to take advantage of the ability to get it cheaply or for free? Remember when file sharing was first becoming a thing, and there were arguments that it was hurting record sales, but also that people were being introduced to bands they wouldn't otherwise have heard of? I'm sure both were true, and it's difficult to prove which was more common. But then, artists generally don't make that much from record sales anyway. That said, I did buy both a Cracker compilation including a live recording and a Johnny Hickman solo album at the show, so I'm doing my tiny part.

I took the bus down to South Jersey after the show, and drove to Cherry Hill for the Monster-Mania Convention the next day. Beth and I were both quite tired, but even the panels that weren't all that interesting tended to go by pretty quickly this time. The panels are often in the form of reunions, which basically means several actors who were in the same movie, and often not the most famous ones.

Lee Majors did the first session, then after him were reunions for Fright Night, Revenge of the Nerds, The Fog, and Halloween 6.

We've seen the first and the last of those. I've heard people say the producer's cut of the Halloween film is better than the official version, but I've also heard it involves Dr. Loomis becoming evil, which doesn't sound right. Apparently there was a lot of difficulty in getting the movie made, including the director finding Loomis' character boring when Donald Pleasence largely carried the earlier movies (well, except 3, which he wasn't in, and neither was Michael Myers).

Jason Patric, who was in The Lost Boys, had his own question-and-answer session. I have seen that one, but I don't remember it much. It does have the distinction of being the first R-rated movie Beth saw at the theater, but I'm sure that's unrelated to how much attention the convention gives it. Then came two actors from the Bates Motel television series, followed by five stars of Nightmare on Elm Street 4.

These included Robert Englund, who is pretty much just known as Freddy Krueger when he's known at all, but has actually worked with a lot of different actors and done just about every sort of acting work. While he could easily fill an hour by himself, he's also quite good at directing attention to his co-stars. We've made a habit of eating at the nearby Friendly's after the convention, but this time they were out of Diet Coke, and the waiter said he'd accept a coupon but the manager wouldn't take it. He could have told us these things when we first got there.

I started a new temp job today, which is supposed to be full-time for a few months, but today and tomorrow it's only five hours per day. Then I don't come in at all on Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, or Monday. For me, training is pretty much always more tedious than actually doing the work.
vovat: (zoma)

Another Halloween gone by, and the Great Pumpkin never showed up. We had to settle for the Adequate Pumpkin. No, seriously, finding things to do on Halloween when you're an adult is kind of a challenge. I was allowed to dress up at work, but I didn't, as I didn't have the chance to put together a costume. There's also a Halloween-themed Oz story for which I've had the basic idea for about twenty years, and I thought maybe this year would be when I finally wrote it. I guess there's always next year. I actually just got an idea for another Oz Christmas story, but we'll see if anything comes of that. [livejournal.com profile] bethje and I did get to go on two haunted hayrides this year. We were hoping for more, but all the others either weren't running this year, or could only be paid for in a package deal with other stuff we didn't want. For some reason, everyone seems to be marketing zombie paintball, which combines two things that have never particularly interested me. The one we did go on last weekend, at a mulch place near Hammonton, was pretty fun.

On Halloween night itself, we went into Manhattan for a ghost tour of the East Village. We've been on these in Philadelphia and Ocean City before, and it was largely the same deal. A guide takes you on a tour of the area, and points out buildings where someone claims they saw the ghost of some famous person. I'm very much a skeptic when it comes to such things; the human imagination is a powerful thing, especially when planted with suggestions. Still, if there really are ghosts, their lives--er, afterlives--must be pretty boring. Sure, at first you can get some fun out of floating through walls and jumping out at people, but after a while that would probably get tedious. The lady who gave the tour last night wore a witch's outfit and performed in character as Peter Stuyvesant's wife Judith, complete with Dutch accent. She was amusing, and made jokes along the way. One of the places we stopped was McSorley's, a bar said to be haunted by Harry Houdini. The guide told us about how Sir Arthur Conan Doyle held a seance for Houdini's mother, but the magician didn't buy it because his mother didn't know English. Although I'm not sure the guide actually said this, I kind of got the impression this happened at the bar, when the Internet tells me it was actually in Atlantic City. I suppose it was just a good story involving Houdini and ghosts. Apparently Houdini and Doyle were good friends for a long time, but totally at odds on supernatural matters, and the seance was the last straw between them. What was more mysterious about the tour was how our group managed to shrink. There were three girls who started it with us and had Beth take their picture, but they disappeared not long after that. Hey, maybe they were ghosts! Or, you know, they had something else to do and slipped out onto the crowded Manhattan streets where nobody can ever find anybody without very specific directions. I was very tired by the time we got home, but we still have a few horror movies to watch.

To move to something that's scary in a totally different way, it came out recently that Jian Ghomeshi is abusive to women. I didn't really follow his television and radio career, but I was a fan of Moxy Früvous back in the day, and he always came across as pretty gentle. I guess that just goes to show how images can be deceiving. He claimed that everything he did with women was consensual, but: 1) according to several women, this is a lie; and 2) that carries no weight legally. Even if it HAD been consensual, I don't think that's the kind of thing you can do in casual relationships. I don't know much about BDSM, but everything I've heard about it suggests it's pretty much entirely about trust.
vovat: (Default)
So, here's a story of animal abandonment to set the mood for Monday. Some people were renting the house next door to [livejournal.com profile] bethje's mom and uncle, and they had a pet pig, some chickens, and a duck. When they were evicted because they couldn't pay the rent, they left the animals behind in a rather shoddily constructed pen. Why would anyone just leave their animals like that? So Beth's family has been feeding the animals, and I saw them this past weekend. The pig, whose name is Nancy, really is very nice. She'll run up to the side of the pen and try to look over if a person comes, so she can see if they brought her anything. The chickens and duck are in the next pen over, and I have to wonder if their wings are clipped, because they never try to escape.

I'm glad Comedy Central reruns new Futurama episodes several times during the week, because the hotel where we were staying on Wednesday night didn't get the channel at all. I actually watched the newest one, "The Butterjunk Effect," at 2:40 this morning. It was basically a throwaway episode, although it did develop Leela's relationship with Fry a little bit, as well as how she gets along with Amy. The idea of the butterfly derby was creative, but not really enough to carry the entire plot. A subplot might have been nice, or at least a little more with what happened to Fry, instead of just having the cop-out "he's back to normal for no reason" ending. It was nice to see Kif's planet and parents again, and I wasn't at all surprised to see the Grand Midwife show up again as well.

One thing I've been thinking of regarding the Colorado shooting is how it apparently affected box office sales for The Dark Knight Rises. I guess I understand this on one level, as it's a bad association, but I really don't think it's too likely there will be another shooting at the same movie. As far as I can tell, this was a lone wacko, not a terrorist organization targeting movie theaters. I actually heard some guy on the radio last night saying that he wasn't going to see the movie, but now he wants to in order to make a stand. Okay, but I don't think the shooter's goal was to stop people from seeing that particular film. I guess it could have been, but I doubt it. The same radio dude compared it to how he immediately wanted to fly after September 11th, but again, I don't think the goal was to stop people from getting on airplanes. Contrary to popular belief, it also wasn't for people not to shop or eat at restaurants. What I've heard gives the impression that what Al Qaeda wanted was to keep the United States from interfering in the Middle East. My advice would be to do what you were going to do anyway, and if that involves seeing the Batman movie, go for it. I'm still not sure whether I'll see it at the theater. Beth wants to, but she wants to watch The Dark Knight first, since we never did before.
vovat: (Autobomb)
This past week, [livejournal.com profile] bethje had to go to Washington, DC to take a class for her job, and I went down there with her. During the day when Beth was at class, I mostly just hung around the hotel room. This in and of itself was a nice break from the usual, as the room had air conditioning. Outside, it was sometimes as much as one hundred degrees, so I was grateful for the cooling. After her class, we'd usually go out and sometimes see some sights as well. Here's a bit of a run-down:

Monday: Saw the Washington Monument and the Lincoln Memorial, which are located way out of the way of any Metro stops, so we were tired out after walking there and back. I remember going to the top of the Monument when I was a kid, but it was closed up this time. Speaking of the Metro, the varying fares were annoying for someone more used to the New York subway, which has a flat rate from when you enter to when you leave. Dinner that evening was at a bar that I forget the name of, which had passable but not great food.

Tuesday: We took the Metro to Dupont Circle, and ate at a nearby Italian place called Otello. I had the rigatoni with sausage and mushrooms, which was quite tasty. After dinner, we stopped by a bookstore and Beth bought a copy of Everything Is Illuminated, since she loved the movie.

Wednesday: This was the day we went to see the Capitol, and also when we got caught in the rain. After changing our drenched clothes, we ate at Nage, a fancy restaurant in the hotel where we were staying, the Marriott Courtyard Embassy Row. Beth had duck, and I had pork schnitzel with pretzel coating.

Thursday: If I may draw your attention back to Tuesday for a moment, we passed a restaurant and bar called the Madhatter on our search for a restaurant near Dupont Circle. I was somewhat enamored of the Alice in Wonderland theme, so I convinced Beth that we should go there for dinner. There were a lot of Alice-related decorations on the walls (our table was next to a French poster for Disney's animated Alice in Wonderland), and as part of the theme they served us tea before the meal. I'm not a big fan of tea, but I like it more than coffee, and I drank it to keep it the spirit. It was a pretty good citrus-flavored iced tea. After that, we had rolls with orange butter, and finally the main course. I ended up getting a bacon cheeseburger, rather boring but still quite good. I also had carrot cake for dessert. After dinner, we eventually made it to the White House, despite my getting us lost in the Circle.

Friday: Checkout time at the hotel was noon, when Beth was already at her class. I read from some books while waiting for her, and her class let out early, so I accompanied her to the train station. The government paid for her to take the train there and back, but not for me, so I took the Greyhound instead. I do have to say that the new Express Greyhounds are nicer than the old ones, but traffic was pretty bad, so I got to Philadelphia much later than I had planned. And this was AFTER I had paid $15 to get an earlier ticket. I finished Robert Rankin's The Dance of the Voodoo Handbag while on the bus, or maybe it was actually a little before boarding. Friday was also the day of the shooting in Colorado, and I'm not going to go into too much detail on that, but I will offer my condolences to the victims and their families and friends. Unfortunately, it seems to me that there isn't always a way to tell who's going to snap and do something insanely horrible. Apparently this guy was planning the shooting for a while, though, which makes it even worse to my mind. I guess I can understand a momentary lapse in sanity more than a long-lasting one, even if not by that much.
vovat: (Default)

Happy Valentine's Day! I've never been too keen on this so-called holiday, but I think [livejournal.com profile] bethje likes it, and I suppose there's really no harm in it. It's just a little ridiculous, when you get down to it. Speaking of which, our anniversary is coming up. It's our fourth, but by Pirates of Penzance logic it'll be our first, as we got married on the twenty-ninth of February. So I'd like to do something special for that, but I'm terrible at planning. Any ideas? (If you really do have any, you might want to send them to me privately, since Beth can read this.)

So, what else? Whitney Houston died this past weekend, and while I can't say I was ever a particular fan of hers, it still came out of nowhere.

Actually, what's weird is that one of the tabloids they carry at my workplace had a cover story about Whitney collapsing, and I guess for once they were actually on to something. I read Margaret Cho's post on the subject (I'm not sure why I've been referencing her posts so much recently, but she really does nail it sometimes), and I think she has a point when she says she's "sick of the superiority people have about drug addiction and problems and how it’s funny and like a ‘trainwreck’ when someone is caught on camera stumbling and mumbling outside of a club and then they die and no one is surprised." I know I've been guilty of this myself; drugs are one subject on which I can be just as judgmental as the fundamentalists I'm constantly criticizing. I'm trying to overcome that, though, as I realize a lot of people turn to drugs because of actual problems in their life. And hey, I know what it's like to be depressed. I have to say that I'm more sympathetic toward the people who do drugs to overcome pain (real or perceived, because on a mental level it's essentially the same anyway) than the ones who just want to be trendy. I'm also quite critical, perhaps overly so, when it comes to smoking. I've seen pictures of Adele smoking, and I can't help but wonder if that's the reason she needed the throat surgery.

And I LIKE Adele; she's cute (not that that should necessarily matter, but she is) and has a good voice, and "Someone Like You" is a really catchy song.

I don't know. I just don't recommend smoking AND trying to make it as a singer. Well, unless you want to be the next Tom Waits, I guess. Anyway, while it appears that no one knows the cause of Whitney's death for sure, it might have been an overdose on prescription medication. Sound familiar? Is there a conspiracy by Hollywood doctors to do in middle-aged celebrities?

Sunday's new Simpsons episode was a mixed bag for me. I liked Bart and Milhouse busting the myths around the school, but the Lisa plot didn't make a whole lot of sense. The kid writes like Hemingway, so Lisa assumes he also treats girls like Hemingway did? How does that follow? Oh, well. It had its moments, and there have certainly been worse episodes as of late. The Family Guy episode was interesting inasmuch as Beth and I have been to a few horror conventions, so we've probably seen the guy who played Michael Myers in Halloween 4 at some point. Since Myers is such a physical role, he's always been played by stunt men. George P. Wilbur, the guy Tom Tucker was supposed to have been, has done stunt work in a lot of movies, some quite high-profile. Actually, I remember Tucker mentioning in an earlier episode that James Woods talked him out of auditioning for the role of Freddy Krueger, so his having played Myers isn't just an isolated joke. I suppose it's TWO loosely connected jokes, unless there have been other references to his acting career that I'm forgetting about.
vovat: (Polychrome)
It's Martin Luther King Day, and even though where I work is still open, I'm not working today. I wonder if it's because they'd have to pay me extra for working on a holiday. I don't know. Unfortunately, when thinking of Dr. King, it's hard not to be reminded how his daughter and niece are blatantly homophobic. People will say that the struggle for gay rights is different from that for racial equality, and yeah, it's not the same. Nobody is demanding that gay people pay a poll tax or drink from different water fountains, although it sounds like Richard Floyd of Tennessee would probably be in favor of such legislation. But the important point is that, even though they're different struggles, they're both important and both about how people shouldn't have different rights because of irrelevant differences. How is the fact that someone has a different sexual orientation hurting you any more than their having a different skin color would?

Okay, I think it's time to take a break from serious subjects for a little while, and talk about cartoons. The idea of Lisa starting a Facebook-like social network for Springfield is a little weird when an earlier episode actually mentioned Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook, but the way it played out was all right. Not great, but all right. Nothing earth-shattering in the plot or the humor, but I guess it worked, and the frame story with the trial was a good way to riff on the typical episode structure. I do get a bit annoyed at people making the same point over and over again about how socializing online isn't really the same as socializing in person, though. When you're socially awkward, you take what you can get. I'm not sure why this one ended up running short enough to require the unrelated bit at the end, but on the other hand it was nice to see another one after so long. Was it supposed to be in the style of Edward Gorey or someone else? I'm not quite sure.

I don't have a whole lot to say about the Family Guy episode other than that it really highlighted how much of a jerk Brian can be. I'm sure I've talked before about how it's interesting that Brian has gradually changed from the voice of reason to a character with his own significant flaws. I don't know exactly how that happened, but I think it has a lot to do with the idea that a sentient dog dating human women is acceptable within the confines of the show. If I remember correctly, the early episodes never really got into Brian's love life, and it's when they did that they played up how shallow he could be. Then there's the fact that he's become somewhat of a self-insert for Seth MacFarlane, so maybe there's an element of self-parody involved.

I didn't watch the Napoleon Dynamite cartoon. I wasn't a big fan of the movie anyway, although it certainly had its moments. Really, though, why is Fox trying to squeeze more milk out of that cow at this point? And is there really anything else they can do with the character? Eh, whatever. I've never really watched Allen Gregory either, although I did once have it on in the background while on the computer. I can take or leave The Cleveland Show; I generally watch it when it's on between two other things I was already planning on watching, but otherwise not so much. Regardless, I wish Fox would just stick with a schedule instead of changing it every week. And what happened to Bob's Burgers, anyway? I think I heard something about it coming back in March, but not what time slot it would be in.

As far as things I didn't watch, you can add the Golden Globes to the list. As far as I can tell, the only point of the endless awards shows is to see attractive celebrities in pretty clothes. And sure, I like that as much as the next person, and perhaps more than some, but even that tends to bear out the disconnect between rich people and everyone else. "Here's Female Celebrity X, wearing a dress that she got for free from a company that helped to ruin the American economy by shipping all its jobs overseas." Which is part of why I never buy it when people claim Hollywood is liberal.
Anyway, behind the cut are some pretty girls in outfits made by job-killing corporations. )
vovat: (Polychrome)
Hey, it's [livejournal.com profile] bethje's birthday today! Happy birthday!

I suppose I'd better say something about the Michael Ian Black show we attended on Friday, huh? It was at the Trocadero in Philadelphia, and there was an opener whose name I can't remember, but he had some good jokes. Since we were in Pennsylvania, Michael himself kept referencing the Penn State scandal.

I haven't really been keeping up on said scandal, but I think it's totally ridiculous that there were actually riots when Joe Paterno was fired. So what, you SUPPORT hushing up pedophilic rape? In a way, though, I'm not too surprised, because Penn State's obsession with football is really freaky. I actually applied there and got accepted, but after seeing the campus I wasn't really interested in going there. The whole football thing was just WAY too creepy for me. My brother did go to Penn State, though, and I don't think he's a particular fan of football.

What else can I mention? Well, I'm still working on cataloging the characters from apocryphal Oz books, which is generally a fun task. I'm currently working through the March Laumer books, and I'm not entirely sure whether I should include the Russian Magic Land characters or not. Laumer's usual approach was to present Magic Land as an alternate version of Oz that has some communication with the main one, but it's not always as neat as that makes it sound. For instance, Urfin Jus shows up in the main Oz from time to time.

Yesterday, I had to get the brakes on my car replaced, which cost me quite a bit of money. And that pretty much brings us up to the present. I haven't had a chance to watch the Simpsons episode from Sunday, as I was at work at the time, but I might have something to say about that in a later post.
vovat: (Default)
Today, I got around to watching last night's Simpsons, and the American Dad and Family Guy from last week. Or was it two weeks ago? I can't remember. It was the AD where Roger played Snot's girlfriend, and the FG with Lois' sister (since when does she have one of those?) married Mayor West. I wonder if the marriage is going to be canonical. As for the most recent Simpsons, you'll notice that they didn't mention that the original Fat Tony had died. Since this guy presumably wasn't a widower and instead had a wife who looked to be much younger than him, I guess anyone who cares about continuity is supposed to assume this is the former Fit Tony. It was kind of weird that they referenced Koyaanisqatsi, since [livejournal.com profile] bethje just recently added that to our Netflix queue. They've actually made quite a few Philip Glass references on the show, though. The Bart and Lisa subplot was amusing, but I kind of wish it had tied in at least slightly with the main plot. I mean, both involved Italian-Americans, right? Also, have you noticed how, since the Simpsons Movie, every pig they've shown has had the little tuft of hair?

I don't think any of them did before that, although I guess we don't know for sure what's under Sir Oinks-A-Lot's hat.


Since I was working last night, however, I missed the television show everyone was talking about, which I believe was called We Got Bin Laden. Seriously, though, Beth texted me about it, and I came home and pretty much immediately made a joke on Twitter about how it might have been a lookalike instead, only to be admonished by at least two different people who said they'd already DNA-tested the body. I guess that'll show me to make a bad joke before getting the facts. At least I wasn't one of the approximately 20,000 people who said Donald Trump wants to see the death certificate, which was funny the first time, but not so much after that. Anyway, I've seen various opinions on the matter, and I think I agree with the people who say it's a relief, but not really a cause for celebration. I mean, there's a definite sense of closure to finally getting this guy we're supposed to have been after for years, and if anyone deserved to die it's definitely him. And while I'd like for him to have been put on trial, from what I've heard it was entirely his decision to go down fighting instead of surrendering quietly. Still, cheering about someone's death, even that of an utterly horrible person, makes me a little uneasy. I don't feel sorry or anything, just that that sort of seems to be stooping to his level. Oh, well.

Since I'm posting anyway, I might as well go ahead and include this survey that I got from SamuraiFrog.
Read more... )
vovat: (zoma)
Actually, most of these items aren't particularly monstrous, but it IS technically Halloween. Unfortunately, I'll be working tonight. Boo! (Um, that's an "I don't like this" kind of boo, not the ghostly variety.)
Read more... )

Happy Halloween, everybody!
vovat: (Bast)
Interestingly, within the past week or so, I found links to rumors about the locations of both Biblical arks, Noah's Ark and the Ark of the Covenant. I seem to recall that, when I first learned about these two arks, I didn't know why the translation used the same word for both, when the latter wasn't a boat. Except it kind of was, or at least a vessel used for conveying something.
Read more... )
vovat: (Default)

J.L. Bell, whom I know from the online community of Oz fans, made an interesting post on the increase of nasty rumors, threats, and such during the Obama administration. And I apparently wasn't the only one who liked it, as Slate picked it up. It does seem like right-wing outlets are eager to dismiss this trend by saying that there's plenty of bad behavior on the left as well. Which there is, but I don't think there's any real comparison for some of what's going on. This is especially true in terms of racism. Conservatives will insist that the majority of Republicans and Tea Partiers aren't racist, yet they refuse to call out the people who are. As I've argued before, why wouldn't they want to call out the bad apples from their own side? And really, isn't the right wing meaner in general? Not necessarily more critical, but just less likely to be sympathetic. Think about it. If you're more likely to be pro-war, pro-gun, opposed to social programs, resistant to expansion of civil rights, in favor of corporate bigwigs over their employees, unwilling for any of your money to support the less fortunate, and tough on crime...well, that suggests meanness to me. Now, there might well be cases where meanness is more effective than niceness, so I'm not saying these positions are always wrong. What I am saying is that they usually tend toward the violent and exclusive. So why is it Not Done to mention this? And why does nobody do anything about Facebook groups like this one? (I guess it's possible that someone HAS done something, as that's the kind of thing that might well attract the attention of the Secret Service, but if so I haven't heard of it.)


By the way, while I think part of why people like Jon Stewart criticize Fox News is indeed that they're a propaganda outlet rather than a legitimate source of news, we can't discount that it's fun to take swipes at them because they're one of the ultimate examples of being able to dish it out and not take it. Pretty much any criticism of Fox News on some other station, even if it's a joke, will result in a whole lot of "Awww, why does the liberal media have to be so MEAN?" responses from Fox News itself. It's an entire channel of self-satisfied bullies, and I'm not using "bully" in the sense that Theodore Roosevelt did.

If I may switch to another topic, have you heard about the Lane Bryant commercial that was banned by ABC, allegedly because it showed too much cleavage or something stupid like that?

So, okay, how is that any worse than the Victoria's Secret commercials they show on network TV all the time? Is it an FCC regulation that we're only allowed to see women in underwear if they're emaciated? For more takes on this subject, see here and here.

Another item that got me thinking was this one on changing the image of medical marijuana. While I'm not so keen on the drug business in general, I do think weed needs a facelift, so to speak. While the government is doing plenty to discredit pot, the potheads are unwittingly helping them out. I've never smoked marijuana myself, but I know plenty of people who have without getting into jam bands, patchouli, High Times magazine, saying "420" at every possible opportunity, and emblazoning pot leaves on things as if they're at all attractive.
vovat: (Minotaur)

I've already said a bit about Medusa, but after reading [livejournal.com profile] kevenn's review of the Clash of the Titans remake, I felt she was worth another look. Only not a DIRECT look, because I don't want to be turned to stone.


I actually remember when I first learned about the Gorgon. There was a Medusa pinball game at our local pizza place, and my dad explained about how she had snakes for hair and anyone who saw her turned to stone. What I didn't learn until long after that was just how many versions of the Medusa legend there were. Earlier takes on the myth made her one of the primitive chthonic monsters that were always being killed by heroes to pave the way for civilization. She was the daughter of the primordial sea deities Phorcys and Ceto, and was totally hideous. Later, the myths gave her two sisters, Stheno and Euryale, and the three were of course known collectively as the Gorgons. Later depictions and stories actually started making Medusa attractive apart from the snakes, and Ovid's version of the myth says that she was originally a drop-dead gorgeous priestess in the temple of Athena. When she and Poseidon had sex in the temple, Athena punished her by turning her into the serpent-tressed monster we all know and love. I'm not sure the story was entirely clear on whether this intercourse was willing or not. You'd think it would have to be, as there wouldn't be any sense in punishing her for something that was done TO her. Unfortunately, however, the idea of blaming rape victims has a long history, and is still practiced in some parts of the world. You probably remember the recent story of a Somali girl being stoned to death for that. Poseidon probably said Medusa was asking for it because she dressed too provocatively. The thing is, you'd think Athena would sympathize with the Gorgon, considering that not only is she female, but also supposed to be the wisest of the Olympians. As we learned in the story of Arachne, however, the goddess was not at all free from jealousy and wrath. Apparently the new Clash film uses the idea that Medusa was raped and then punished for it, and if what Kevenn said is correct, then this was never even frowned upon!


By the way, did Medusa have to feed the snakes, or were they parasitic creatures living off nutrients from her body? Inquiring minds want to know! {g}

This last picture was drawn by Becca, whose blog is definitely worth a look. Probably not at work, though, as there's occasional nudity.
vovat: (Bowser)
I'm most likely not doing a video game post this week, unless I think of something while I'm at work. I've been known (well, known by myself, anyway) to plan out posts pretty much word for word while working, although of course they don't come out exactly the same when I actually write them. The Mushroom Guru posts were fun, but I've largely run out of ideas, and I can only recall receiving two comments on them anyway. Am I using the wrong forum, or were they just not funny? Either is possible, but it's difficult to tell when no one leaves feedback. And when I make comments like that, it's pretty much always people who comment on other posts anyway who leave a reply like, "Oh, I'm sorry. I've been busy recently." While I definitely appreciate your replies, I'm really not talking to you, but to anyone reading this who NEVER comments. Then again, maybe there aren't any people in that category. I don't know. While I'll probably keep using LiveJournal for posts about my life, is there a better place for my creative experiments and observations on religion and mythology? And if so, would it be possible for me to an RSS feed on LJ, so people who DO like this format would be able to read them without going somewhere else? I feel like I've asked these same basic questions many times, and while I've gotten answers, they've never really been enough to go on. Really, that's mostly my fault, though. I'm just not sure where to get started.

Anyway, I originally wasn't going to make a post at all today, but then I came across this article. Aren't you glad that ridiculous bigotry is still alive and well? Because I'm not, but it looks like someone must be. [livejournal.com profile] bethje had told me earlier about Constance McMillen not being able to bring her girlfriend to her prom, and how when the ACLU got involved, the school just canceled the prom entirely. Well, they apparently settled the issue by holding a small event for Constance and her date that only four other people attended, while other students attended a separate prom. I wondered for a minute why anyone would have attended the separate prom knowing the prejudice that went into the decision, but then I remembered that we're talking about high school students here. The article touches on how cruel an environment high school is for anyone who's different in pretty much any way, and how the schools rarely do anything to prevent this. In fact, in this case, we have the school coming right out and saying, "Hooray for homophobia!" Doesn't it figure that this school would be in Mississippi, and have "agricultural" in its name? Does a state that's stereotyped so much by the rest of the country really want to perpetuate the stereotypes? Come on, if you're portrayed as marrying your first cousins and having five kids by the time you're sixteen, it's probably not a good idea to marginalize anyone else for their sexual identity. Obviously the redneck stereotypes aren't true for most people either, but this school and its students certainly aren't helping matters. Oh, and of course there are also bigots leaving comments on the article, yakking about the "gay agenda." First of all, this is a phrase that you obviously took from someone else, meaning you're just parroting another person's thoughts. And really, if you want to talk about agendas, which is more of one? Wanting to have the same civil rights as everyone else, or working hard to overturn that pesky separation of church and state?
vovat: (Victor)

We all know about Kanye West interrupting Taylor Swift's moment in the spotlight at the Video Music Awards to announce that Beyonce had one of the best videos of all time. But was he right? I hadn't seen either of the videos all the way through at the time. I'd heard the songs, which are of the typical pop hit variety, simple and impossible to get out of your head when you've heard them. I do have to say that Taylor had some bad timing with her song, though, because it's about her thinking she belongs with someone because they know everything about each other, when I'm currently learning that that doesn't always work out. Are you mocking me, Taylor? What did I ever do to you?

Anyway, here's the video for Beyonce's "Single Ladies":


It's her dancing for the entire length of the song. The fact that Kanye thinks this is one of the best videos of all time makes me wonder how many others he's seen. Maybe he was like me, and grew up without cable. Mind you, it's Beyonce's choice if she wants to release a fairly minimal video, and she's no slouch as a dancer. But really, I don't know the basis for judging the VMAs (considering that it's MTV, it probably has something to do with the size of the bribe offered), but I would have to think creativity would be an important factor. As you can see, Beyonce's video was sorely lacking in that department. Now, here's Taylor's video for "You Belong with Me":


I certainly wouldn't say it's one of the best of all time either, but it's clever and kind of sweet, and looks like a good deal of effort went into it. So, yeah, definitely a better video than Beyonce's. I'll have to agree with the President on this one.
vovat: (Default)

At this point, you know what might well bother me most about the ongoing Tiger Woods coverage? It's not even interesting! He didn't offer to rub falafel on someone's boobs. He didn't get a blow job in the Oval Office. He didn't come up with some hilariously lame cover story involving the Appalachian Trail. He isn't a hypocritical megachuch pastor or values voter. He's just some dude who cheated on his wife. Who cares? Figures that a golfer would be involved in a scandal just as dull as the sport he plays.

Aside from the increased publicity (and they say there's no such thing as bad publicity, but I don't know that I agree with that), I think why Tiger is playing along with the media is that he lost a lot of his lucrative endorsements. That also doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me. I mean, the companies that paid him to endorse their products can make their own choices, but I have to wonder what marketing person would say, "This guy cheated on his wife? That's not the image we want for our sneakers!" How is it even remotely relevant? Oh, but he's a bad role model! So what? Isn't it an important lesson to learn that celebrity athletes are human, and do stupid things? What I really have to wonder is why Tiger even got married in the first place if he wanted to whore around. Or does the wife date back to the days before he was famous? Regardless, why are they still married now? I'd have to suspect that anyone who'd stick with her husband after he cheated that many times either doesn't care (in which case an apology is hardly necessary) or is extremely gullible ("Sure, he cheated 300 times, but I believe him when he says he won't again!"). I don't really know the circumstances, though. Maybe they're staying together for financial reasons. Hey, I know how that is.
vovat: (zoma)
1. Online Presence and Future - Between this journal, Twitter, Facebook, and Tumblr, it can sometimes be a bit of a challenge deciding where to address a certain topic. Really, I don't use Facebook much except to link to stuff I've written elsewhere, as I find the interface rather overly complicated. On the other hand, that's where I have the most followers, so there's no accounting for tastes. I use Tumblr pretty much exclusively for pictures and videos, although I'll occasionally throw in a link or a brief text post. Twitter is for brief observations (as it pretty much has to be by its very nature; I actually kind of like the fact that it prevents me from being unnecessarily verbose), and this journal is for a real mishmash of stuff. Lately, I've been writing more topic-specific posts (Oz, mythology, video games, etc.) than personal stuff here on LJ, and I have to wonder if it's really the best medium for that. It's convenient, but [livejournal.com profile] bethje has said she suspects people tend to see "LiveJournal" and think it's going to be someone whining about their relationships (which I do do, but not quite as often). She and some other people have suggested getting my own domain, but I have to admit I have no clue how to do that, or how to work with it when I do have it. I know some people have blogs (i.e., movable type) on sites that aren't specifically tailored for it (like LiveJournal, Blogspot, Wordpress, etc.), so I know it's very possible, but I don't know how to arrange such a thing. And does anyone think I'd actually get more traffic that way, or would it just be a waste of money? I'm looking for input here, people!

2. iPod So You Don't Have To - I've been considering getting a new MP3 player, since my current one is now about four years old. It still plays, but it has occasional problems, and it's probably better not to wait until it conks out entirely. I currently have a Creative player, and I like it, but I don't think they make any with much storage capacity these days. I know some of the iPod Classics can store a lot of music, but is it true that you can only use those with one computer? I've heard that, if you plug an iPod into someone else's computer, it will erase all of the stored data. Is this true, and if so, is there any way to get around it?

3. This Is Not Really an Item - I already mentioned this on Twitter, but I thought I'd elaborate on how ridiculous I found it when an eHarmony commercial insisted that it WASN'T a dating site. Their explanation for this was that it was a match-making site, or something like that. I forget the actual phrase they used, but it was something that sounded suspiciously like a dating site to me. It reminded me of something I first read in a Chick Tract and later heard from other fundamentalists, which is that Christianity isn't a religion, but a relationship with God. I don't think any of them have been able to sufficiently explain what the difference is, though. Is saying things aren't what they pretty obviously are a growing trend?

4. Brangelina Blues - Well, I've now heard about 80,000 times from various media that Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie are breaking up, although they officially deny it. Wow, what a shock! You know, if you get shocked by really obvious things. ("Oh, wow! Grass is GREEN!") Didn't Brad cheat on Jennifer Aniston with Ms. Jolie in the first place? Not that I really blame him for that one, since at least Angelina is somewhat interesting. Ms. Aniston has to be one of the dullest people in the entertainment business, yet somehow she keeps appearing on magazine covers. The story usually seems to be something like "Jen upset over break-up," which I suppose is news because people who didn't star in Friends just LOVE breaking up. But anyway, my point is that I never figured either Brad or Angelina for the type who goes for stable relationships.

5. Haitian Satan - An interesting post I read today puts Pat Robertson's moronic comments about Haiti into context. Apparently the idea that the Haitians are in league with the Prince of Darkness is nothing new, because some Christians assume that Voodoo rituals must be Satanic. Yes, we're back to the idea that every god other than yours has to be the Devil in disguise, as if Satan really has that much free time. As the article mentions, Christianity itself was subject to that sort of slur in its early days. I can't say I believe in any of these gods, but I always kind of liked the ancient Roman notion that having more gods would strengthen the state. Really, I think paganism would work out well in today's society, because as it is we have hundreds of different interpretations of the same deity. If you really want a violent deity, why bother insisting that the notorious pacifist Jesus would have been cool with guns? Just become a devotee of a war god (Ares/Mars, Tyr, Mithras, etc.), and you can easily mix your pro-war stance with your religious fanaticism! Also, I think I might do an article on Voodoo mythology in the near future, as I don't know a whole lot about it and it sounds interesting. I do know one of their gods (or loa, anyway) is a skeleton in a top hat, and how can you go wrong with that?
vovat: (zoma)

I haven't really said much about the Leno-Conan fiasco, mostly because I can't think of anything to add. I don't actually watch Conan much, but I think he's a funny, likable guy who deserved more of a chance in the new time slot. Leno, on the other hand, makes me uneasy. It's partially that his jokes are so dumbed down, but I think it might be even more because of his put-on masculinity. Hey, it's fine that he likes to work on cars (in fact, maybe his talents are being wasted as a comedian), but I get the impression that he likes to call attention to it as a way of saying, basically, "I'm a REAL MAN, not a nerd like all those other comedians!" Tim Allen comes across much the same way, and I remember catching a glimpse of him on Leno recently. The hyper-masculine insecurity in that studio must have been thick enough to cut with a knife. I think Conan is okay with being a nerd, which gives him more cred in my book. But even putting all that aside, if Leno wanted to leave the Tonight Show to a younger comedian and the network didn't like Conan, why not suggest another young talent instead of taking it back yourself? And why WOULD Leno have gotten worse ratings in prime time, anyway? Were his fans too out-of-it to think of turning on the TV an hour earlier?

In other news, you've probably heard of the coded Bible verses written on weapons. Apparently the military is now planning on removing them. But anyway, I also recently read [livejournal.com profile] vee_ecks's review of The Book of Eli, and apparently the movie is about a future in which all Bibles have been destroyed. I put two and two together, as I'm wont to do when I really want four of something, and determined that these Biblically-inscribed weapons are actually prototypes for Bible-seeking missiles. Everyone thinks the verses are there to promote Christianity, but it's secretly the exact opposite, with the verses there as some kind of text-seeking magic. Makes as much sense as just about anything else in these crazy times, anyway.


And to tie the entire post together, I believe the Bible spoke of Leno, who is the Beast of Revelation. His wound that healed represents his failed prime-time experiment. And the second beast, the one from the land who makes everyone worship the first beast, is presumably Kevin Eubanks. Why else would he laugh at all of Jay's bad jokes?

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15 161718192021
22232425 262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 4th, 2025 03:14 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios