vovat: (wart)
On Saturday, [livejournal.com profile] bethje and I went on our first haunted hayride of the year. This was the same one in Marlboro that we went on last year, and [livejournal.com profile] therealtavie and Sean came with us again. I have to say it was kind of disappointing, especially for fifteen dollars per person. There were a whole lot of haunted events at this place, and I have to wonder if they stretched themselves too thin. It also didn't help that the wagon was covered this time, or that we were on the same ride as some rowdy guys who thought it was hilarious to ask every costumed girl for their phone number.

It was nice to get a Simpsons Treehouse of Horror that actually aired before Halloween, and really this year's was pretty good when compared to other recent ones. All I'd read beforehand about the first segment, "School Is Hell," was that Bart and Lisa were transported to Hell when they read an Aramaic incantation on a school desk. Not the most original premise, perhaps, but they pulled it off with a plot about Bart deciding to attend school in Hell because he was actually good at it. There were a lot of quick jokes that were quite amusing, including the names of the subjects and the books. The guy who was damned for docetism was also funny. Overall, it was creative and actually Halloween-themed. The second was "A Clockwork Yellow," which began as a fairly straight Clockwork Orange parody, but then threw in a hodge-podge of references to other Stanley Kubrick movies. I didn't get all of them, but neither did the Comic Book Guy, so I guess I shouldn't feel too bad about it. "The Others" was easily the weakest, but even it had its moments. The premise, that the Simpsons' house was haunted by the ghosts of their old Tracey Ullman selves, was good; but it seemed like they weren't sure where to go with it. Having the modern Simpsons all either commit suicide or get murdered seemed unnecessary. I did like the ending, though, with the arrival of multiple Simpsons families in different animation styles and the callback to the old picture-taking short. I'm actually kind of surprised they didn't use the Griffins from Family Guy as one of the rip-off families. Speaking of which, the newest FG wasn't bad, but it was very by-the-numbers. At least they didn't air this one along with last week's Simpsons, as they both had the family trying to run a food-based business. And that brings us to the question of why they haven't been airing new Bob's Burgers episodes. Apparently there won't be another one until November. Hasn't Fox learned yet that interspersing animated shows with live-action ones doesn't work?

I recently finished the second book of Pogo comics, Bona Fide Balderdash, which collected the strips from 1951 and 1952. I don't have that much to add from my review of the first volume, but it definitely holds up even though it was originally published long before I was born (in fact, my parents were born in 1951). This collection sees the beginning of political satire in the strip, with Pogo running for President.

I'm going to be seeing Robyn Hitchcock live next month. I've been listening to his earlier stuff recently, but he's released so much music over the years that I really have no idea what to expect in concert.
vovat: (Default)

Happy Valentine's Day! I've never been too keen on this so-called holiday, but I think [livejournal.com profile] bethje likes it, and I suppose there's really no harm in it. It's just a little ridiculous, when you get down to it. Speaking of which, our anniversary is coming up. It's our fourth, but by Pirates of Penzance logic it'll be our first, as we got married on the twenty-ninth of February. So I'd like to do something special for that, but I'm terrible at planning. Any ideas? (If you really do have any, you might want to send them to me privately, since Beth can read this.)

So, what else? Whitney Houston died this past weekend, and while I can't say I was ever a particular fan of hers, it still came out of nowhere.

Actually, what's weird is that one of the tabloids they carry at my workplace had a cover story about Whitney collapsing, and I guess for once they were actually on to something. I read Margaret Cho's post on the subject (I'm not sure why I've been referencing her posts so much recently, but she really does nail it sometimes), and I think she has a point when she says she's "sick of the superiority people have about drug addiction and problems and how it’s funny and like a ‘trainwreck’ when someone is caught on camera stumbling and mumbling outside of a club and then they die and no one is surprised." I know I've been guilty of this myself; drugs are one subject on which I can be just as judgmental as the fundamentalists I'm constantly criticizing. I'm trying to overcome that, though, as I realize a lot of people turn to drugs because of actual problems in their life. And hey, I know what it's like to be depressed. I have to say that I'm more sympathetic toward the people who do drugs to overcome pain (real or perceived, because on a mental level it's essentially the same anyway) than the ones who just want to be trendy. I'm also quite critical, perhaps overly so, when it comes to smoking. I've seen pictures of Adele smoking, and I can't help but wonder if that's the reason she needed the throat surgery.

And I LIKE Adele; she's cute (not that that should necessarily matter, but she is) and has a good voice, and "Someone Like You" is a really catchy song.

I don't know. I just don't recommend smoking AND trying to make it as a singer. Well, unless you want to be the next Tom Waits, I guess. Anyway, while it appears that no one knows the cause of Whitney's death for sure, it might have been an overdose on prescription medication. Sound familiar? Is there a conspiracy by Hollywood doctors to do in middle-aged celebrities?

Sunday's new Simpsons episode was a mixed bag for me. I liked Bart and Milhouse busting the myths around the school, but the Lisa plot didn't make a whole lot of sense. The kid writes like Hemingway, so Lisa assumes he also treats girls like Hemingway did? How does that follow? Oh, well. It had its moments, and there have certainly been worse episodes as of late. The Family Guy episode was interesting inasmuch as Beth and I have been to a few horror conventions, so we've probably seen the guy who played Michael Myers in Halloween 4 at some point. Since Myers is such a physical role, he's always been played by stunt men. George P. Wilbur, the guy Tom Tucker was supposed to have been, has done stunt work in a lot of movies, some quite high-profile. Actually, I remember Tucker mentioning in an earlier episode that James Woods talked him out of auditioning for the role of Freddy Krueger, so his having played Myers isn't just an isolated joke. I suppose it's TWO loosely connected jokes, unless there have been other references to his acting career that I'm forgetting about.
vovat: (Default)
It's the beginning of February, so I suppose it's time to wish everyone a happy Candlemas/Imbolc/St.Brigid's/Groundhog's Day. I've written about this odd set of holidays in earlier posts, but essentially we're looking at a pagan Irish festival co-opted by the Christians. In honor of the patron saint of Ireland, I was sick all day yesterday. Wait, that's not related to St. Brigid at all. Oh, well. Anyway, I think I feel better now, and I don't have work today, which is always good.

I thought the most recent Simpsons episode, which I finally got around to watching last night, had an interesting premise. Jeremy Irons (or is that Jeremy's Iron?) provided the voice for Moe's bar rag, which narrated its experiences over the past thousand years. There was a bit of fantasy episode to this one, since it put familiar characters in historical settings, sort of like "Margical History Tour" or some of the Halloween segments. Bizarre, but interesting enough simply for the novelty, and some good historical jokes along the way. I felt that the subplot with Bart and Milhouse, while enjoyable enough, didn't really fit into this one. Since it never really tied in with the bar rag's story, I think it might have been better used in a different episode where it could have been less awkwardly incorporated. Oh, well. As for Family Guy, they did another more serious episode this time, which they seem to be doing quite a bit as of late. Doesn't it seem like they could space these out a bit more? As for the actual issue addressed, it always irritates me when people refuse to get medical treatment for their kids because of some religious reason. It hasn't occurred to you yet that prayer is remarkably ineffective? I wish Lois' speech at the end would actually convince some Christian Scientists in real life, but I really doubt it would.
vovat: (Polychrome)
It's Martin Luther King Day, and even though where I work is still open, I'm not working today. I wonder if it's because they'd have to pay me extra for working on a holiday. I don't know. Unfortunately, when thinking of Dr. King, it's hard not to be reminded how his daughter and niece are blatantly homophobic. People will say that the struggle for gay rights is different from that for racial equality, and yeah, it's not the same. Nobody is demanding that gay people pay a poll tax or drink from different water fountains, although it sounds like Richard Floyd of Tennessee would probably be in favor of such legislation. But the important point is that, even though they're different struggles, they're both important and both about how people shouldn't have different rights because of irrelevant differences. How is the fact that someone has a different sexual orientation hurting you any more than their having a different skin color would?

Okay, I think it's time to take a break from serious subjects for a little while, and talk about cartoons. The idea of Lisa starting a Facebook-like social network for Springfield is a little weird when an earlier episode actually mentioned Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook, but the way it played out was all right. Not great, but all right. Nothing earth-shattering in the plot or the humor, but I guess it worked, and the frame story with the trial was a good way to riff on the typical episode structure. I do get a bit annoyed at people making the same point over and over again about how socializing online isn't really the same as socializing in person, though. When you're socially awkward, you take what you can get. I'm not sure why this one ended up running short enough to require the unrelated bit at the end, but on the other hand it was nice to see another one after so long. Was it supposed to be in the style of Edward Gorey or someone else? I'm not quite sure.

I don't have a whole lot to say about the Family Guy episode other than that it really highlighted how much of a jerk Brian can be. I'm sure I've talked before about how it's interesting that Brian has gradually changed from the voice of reason to a character with his own significant flaws. I don't know exactly how that happened, but I think it has a lot to do with the idea that a sentient dog dating human women is acceptable within the confines of the show. If I remember correctly, the early episodes never really got into Brian's love life, and it's when they did that they played up how shallow he could be. Then there's the fact that he's become somewhat of a self-insert for Seth MacFarlane, so maybe there's an element of self-parody involved.

I didn't watch the Napoleon Dynamite cartoon. I wasn't a big fan of the movie anyway, although it certainly had its moments. Really, though, why is Fox trying to squeeze more milk out of that cow at this point? And is there really anything else they can do with the character? Eh, whatever. I've never really watched Allen Gregory either, although I did once have it on in the background while on the computer. I can take or leave The Cleveland Show; I generally watch it when it's on between two other things I was already planning on watching, but otherwise not so much. Regardless, I wish Fox would just stick with a schedule instead of changing it every week. And what happened to Bob's Burgers, anyway? I think I heard something about it coming back in March, but not what time slot it would be in.

As far as things I didn't watch, you can add the Golden Globes to the list. As far as I can tell, the only point of the endless awards shows is to see attractive celebrities in pretty clothes. And sure, I like that as much as the next person, and perhaps more than some, but even that tends to bear out the disconnect between rich people and everyone else. "Here's Female Celebrity X, wearing a dress that she got for free from a company that helped to ruin the American economy by shipping all its jobs overseas." Which is part of why I never buy it when people claim Hollywood is liberal.
Anyway, behind the cut are some pretty girls in outfits made by job-killing corporations. )
vovat: (Default)
Am I alone in thinking Thanksgiving is a pretty lame holiday? You'd think I'd like a day devoted to eating, but turkey is something I can have a little of and not need more for a while. Why couldn't it be about eating shrimp? Anyway, even though I worked that day, it wasn't until evening and I was able to have dinner with [livejournal.com profile] bethje's family. Her mom is one of eight, so they have a pretty large family. Not all of them show up, but enough do to make the basement awfully crowded.

On Friday, I took Beth to see Peter Tork at New Hope Winery. There had been a Monkees tour earlier this year, but it was canceled prematurely, and she likes to see the former Monkees when they come to the area. He played with his band Shoe Suede Blues, and neither of us are all that keen on blues music, but it was pretty good. They did four Monkees songs in their set: "I'm a Believer," "A Little Bit Me, a Little Bit You" (I guess he felt Neil Diamond wasn't getting enough promotion already), "Daydream Believer," "Last Train to Clarksville," and "I'm Not Your Stepping Stone."
Read more... )
vovat: (Default)
So far, being thirty-four doesn't feel any different from being thirty-three. Really, though, that's the case with every year, isn't it? It's only when you look back that you see the change. I feel like I haven't changed much at all when compared to other people I know, though. It seems like other people have some experience that makes them feel grown up, and that's never happened with me. I don't feel exactly like I did when I was a kid, and I hope I'm not as clueless as I was in my younger days, but how I react to things and what I enjoy doing are still about the same. I wonder if that's true, or if my perspective is skewed because I'm seeing it from the inside instead of the outside.

I just got around to watching last week's Simpsons, and this week's while I was at it. The food blog one was pretty good, although the show does seem to be a bit inconsistent on what Homer will eat. Sometimes he'll eat anything, and other times will avoid anything exotic. I remember a joke in "The Last Temptation of Homer" about his having a cheeseburger at a Chinese restaurant. I guess they just go with whatever they think is funny in a particular scene. It is kind of weird that Homer doesn't want to be a food critic when he already was one in "Guess Who's Coming to Criticize Dinner," but maybe the fact that this led to his almost being killed was what turned him against the idea. I also have to give points to the video game convention scene, although the parody names they come up with have been getting a bit weak. I know we've seen the Funtendo Zii in other episodes, but really, how long did that take for the writers to come up with? Five seconds? There was some discussion of this over at Press the Buttons. Also, I give credit for Lisa ranking Weird Al as one of the sexiest vegetarians. From what I understand, Edward Cullen isn't a vegetarian, but I know that was Stephenie Meyer's fault. Apparently no one every explained to her what a vegetarian was. Last week's Family Guy, with Stewie and Brian going back in time to the very first episode, was a pretty creative idea. It also allowed for a lot of meta-humor, and we finally learn what the characters do after setting up cutaway gags. As for American Dad, Principal Lewis is pretty much always funny, so I approved. The bit about Diff'rent Strokes being based on his childhood was a good running gag.

While this week's Simpsons was another parody of a movie I haven't seen, the idea of collaborative young adult fiction writing as a criminal scheme was amusing enough in and of itself. I also think it did a better job with the multiple twist endings than other episodes have in the past. ("The Great Money Caper" comes to mind here.) A coming-of-age story about trolls is probably actually a good idea, although I have to suspect it's probably been done before. I don't know that the golem love story has, though. One joke I found a bit interesting was when Homer called Neil Gaiman "British Fonzie," because [livejournal.com profile] bethje told me that [livejournal.com profile] not_glimmer said Gaiman was the Fonzie of graphic novels. (I think it was her, anyway.) I'm kind of surprised that it took them this long to have Gaiman guest star, but I guess it's a generational thing. He's been pretty well-known for a while, but mostly with younger people, not people the age of the veteran writers. Family Guy finally found a way to bring back Joe's son Kevin, who was around in earlier episodes and then just kind of disappeared. That he was killed in Iraq was just a one-off line from an earlier episode to explain his absence, but they did incorporate that. They did apparently forget that Brian and Stewie also fought in Iraq for a little while, though.
vovat: (Default)
While I like the idea of an audience poll for The Simpsons, I don't think Ned Flanders and Edna Krabappel really work as a couple. I mean, I thought it was a fine idea for one episode, and maybe could last a few more if the writers have enough ideas, but keeping them together doesn't really seem right. Then again, I supported Edna and Principal Skinner as a couple, and the writers decided to do away with that one. I haven't voted, though, I guess because I don't want to get in the way if a lot of fans really DO want Ned and Edna to stay together. As for the episode itself, I liked that several of the characters who mentioned having been with Edna actually had in previous shows (Comic Book Guy in "My Big Fat Geek Wedding," Moe in "The Seemingly Never-Ending Story," Joey Kramer from Aerosmith in "Flaming Moe's," and of course Skinner over the course of several seasons). With that in mind, though, it's odd that they apparently forgot Ned had been on a date with Edna before, although it was really just to make Skinner jealous. And even if we ignore that, Ned should at least know Mrs. Krabappel, since they interacted a fair amount in "The PTA Disbands." I guess I'm just a much bigger geek than anyone involved in making the show. {g}

Also aired on Sunday (although I didn't get around to watching it until today) was Family Guy's take on Return of the Jedi. The show included a whole lot of jokes about this one was kind of half-assed, and maybe it was, but I still thought it was pretty good. I do think that, by this time, they've used up most of their good Star Wars jokes, but they still did quite a bit that worked. I remember when I saw the last FG Star Wars parody, and discussed with [livejournal.com profile] revme how we hoped they'd work in a reference about all the weird relationships, like Stewie playing Chris and Lois' father. They never actually did, though, which was kind of disappointing. Oh, well. I'm also not sure what was up with the interminable head-nodding scene, but that's probably just because I don't remember that part of the original movie very well. Also, since they brought in American Dad and Cleveland Show characters, it's kind of weird that a major player like Joe would have still been available to play Jabba the Hutt. Or did he play other characters in the first two parts?
vovat: (Woozy)
This week's Simpsons episode had an interesting premise, but it gave me the feeling of something that I hadn't seen being parodied, with that whole Bus 23 thing. I did like it, though, especially the part with Bart trying to do something bad with the keys but ending up helping people instead. The Cletus joke was pretty gross, though. Homer's joyride in the Duff Blimp was less enjoyable, but a nice callback, considering how he missed out on the chance of a blimp ride back in "Lisa the Beauty Queen." And all the plots came together at the end, which was a nice touch. One bit where I think they dropped the ball was having Nelson be the one who'd been held back really often. Wouldn't the obvious choice for this have been Kearney? Since Bart and Nelson were in kindergarten together, as per "Lisa's Sax," I don't think Nelson has been held back yet. The Bob's Burgers episode was good, but the Family Guy was all over the place. I mean, I guess it was supposed to be, and it's not like they don't have irrelevant gags that go on too long in most other episodes, but it just felt even more disorganized than usual. Also, did you notice that when they parodied the American Dad opening with Joe, it was the old opening with the newspaper gag?

In other news, I've been thinking about how I'm more of an analytical fan than a critical one. Maybe this distinction doesn't make sense to anyone else, but I guess what I mean is that I'm mostly interested in how imaginary worlds fit together, and that includes accepting material from entries that aren't quite up to snuff. There seems to be a lot of agreement that The Cowardly Lion of Oz and The Scalawagons of Oz are fairly weak parts of the series, but I still use them in my research. I guess I was thinking of this because I saw people being really critical of the Star Wars prequels, and while they do have their flaws, I'm more interested in what they add to the mythos. Mind you, I really didn't like the midichlorian thing, but I've never been all that keen on only people with the right genetics being able to use magic (and The Force is, for all intents and purposes, magic). It's the same way in Harry Potter, really. If you're a Muggle, you're out of luck. I tend to see it more like other skills, where there's a genetic component, but that doesn't mean the people who don't have a natural knack for something can't do it if they practice enough. It's like the Wizard of Oz says in Ozoplaning with the Wizard of Oz: "Magic is like any other science--it takes practice. Of course, if you are a born fairy like Ozma and the former rulers of Oz, working spells and charms just comes natural--like playing the piano by ear. But if you are not a Fairy, you must study witchcraft and sorcery as I have done with Glinda the Good. It only has been by continuous study and research that I have managed to perfect myself in the arts of wizardry." That's a personal preference, though, and you can make magic work however you want in your imaginary universe. Kind of weird that we wouldn't hear a thing about these midichlorians in an entire trilogy about The Force and the Jedi, however, isn't it?

I do, however, have a tendency to be a bit obsessed with continuity. Getting back to The Simpsons, I realize the show isn't going to have perfect continuity, especially with time passing and the characters never aging. Still, I like a certain amount of consistency, which is why, for instance, I think saying Ned Flanders was sixty was a dumb move. And "Viva Ned Flanders," the episode in which this was stated, isn't even bad. It's just that this doesn't fit with what we knew about the character. I am not, as a general rule, a comic reader, but from what I've read and heard ABOUT the most popular comic titles, the creators seem to want to have it both ways. They'll come up with really complex continuities, then throw them out and reboot everything once they've gotten too convoluted, which sounds like a compromise that will please nobody. I think part of why I haven't gotten into comics is how confusing all the continuity stuff is. I know the main characters, but not everything they've been involved in recently, so where would I start? I have begun reading Neil Gaiman's Sandman, however, since I've had it suggested to me before. I found it a little hard to tell what was going on in the first volume, but the second one is pretty good so far. The convention for serial killers was clever, and I like all the references to mythology. Maybe I'll offer a more complete review at some point.

I was going to close with a bit on Harold Camping's doomsday prediction, but I decided that was better suited for a WordPress post. So I guess that's it for now.
vovat: (Autobomb)
I have a bad habit of assuming that, if someone doesn't get back to me right away, it's because I've done something to offend them. I realize this is ridiculous, especially considering that I'll often take upwards of a week to respond to comments and such. So I'm both paranoid and hypocritical, I suppose. Really, though, there have been times when I think I really DID offend someone to the point they didn't want to talk to me anymore. Back when I was in college, there was one girl who liked my web page and exchanged e-mails with me a few times, but stopped when she said she was joining a sorority and I said they came across as pseudo-communist organizations. Probably not the smartest thing to say, but I still kind of feel that way. I remember when I was doing some preparation work for a church book sale, and some sorority girls were also helping out, and there was just a real sameness to all of them. You know how, in A Wrinkle in Time, the people of Camazotz don't look identical, but they're all somewhat the same, and it turns out that they all share one giant brain? That's basically how sororities come across to me. Maybe not all of them, but it's what comes to my mind. But I digress. Also, a few years ago, somebody added me on LJ but then suddenly removed me a few months later, and when I asked about it she said something about how I was mean to her friends. The main thing I can remember arguing with her friends about, though, was how I think "natural cures" are most often bunk. I'm sure I could have been more tactful in both situations, but it still confuses me a little. It's not like I was being personally insulting, at least as far as I could tell. And anyone who's been reading my journal for a while knows that I often criticize religion, but if anyone religious has stopped following me because of that, they really kept it on the down-low. So what I've gathered is that it's fine to bad-mouth people's deeply held convictions about the very nature of life and the universe, but not to point out that herbal supplements are highly unlikely to cure cancer. Good to know, I guess.

[livejournal.com profile] bethje and I had a bit of a delay in watching last Sunday's cartoon lineup, but we finally did on Wednesday night. I really don't have much to say about the Simpsons episode, which just struck me as kind of trite. While plot lines based on a character discovering a hidden talent have practically infinite possibilities, I think they're starting to get a bit overdone. This time, we find out Homer has a knack for cutting hair, and he opens his own salon. I was amused by Homer's reaction to the constant chatting, however. One thing I wondered was that, in the scene at Moe's when Homer starts remembering everyone's foibles, why does he have one for Ned Flanders? His wife is dead, remember? I think it did just say "stupid," though, so maybe Homer filled that in himself. Also, we get an interesting look at how Lisa is uninterested in Milhouse, but still gets jealous when he's dating someone else. That actually makes a certain amount of sense to me. In other cartoon-based discussion, is every American Dad from now on going to include jokes about how Principal Lewis is a lunatic? Not that I mind them, but I kind of wonder why they've been playing up the character's insanity so much as of late. And I have to give props to the Family Guy episode for being particularly creative. Since when did Leonardo da Vinci have children, though?

Yesterday, Beth and I trekked up to New York City so she could see Rufus Wainwright's tribute to his late mother Kate McGarrigle. I didn't go to the show, but I went along anyway so we could do a little exploring. Beth said she didn't recognize any of the songs from the show, and I wonder if I would have, as my dad had a Kate and Anna McGarrigle album. It was one of only a few cassettes in the car at the time, so I became quite familiar with it. For what it's worth, from what I remember, every song on there was depressing. Anyway, Beth has a thing about wanting to live in Midwood, a largely Jewish neighborhood in Brooklyn. She's told me several times that she's always wanted to be culturally Jewish, so I'm sure that's part of the reason. From our limited look at it, it really does look like a nice neighborhood, and not at all urban despite being in the city. They even had car dealerships, which isn't a selling point, but drives home just how different it is from other parts of New York City. We met [livejournal.com profile] therealtavie for dinner at the Heartland Brewery, and then joined up with Stephanie, who was going to the show with Beth. While they were there, I wandered around the Times Square area looking for a place I could rest and charge my phone, and could not find the latter. I thought Starbucks usually had outlets, but that's apparently not the case in that part of the city. I ended up ordering a smoothie at McDonald's, then sitting around and reading there for a few hours. Beth loaned me her spare battery, so I was able to keep my cell phone intact. Really, though, this is an issue I pretty much never see addressed, but which must come up. I always see people walking around the city talking on cell phones, and I know those batteries don't last forever. So where do they typically charge them? Or do they just not stay out long enough for the battery to die? I'm really quite curious, because when I'm on all-day excursions, I'm always afraid to use my phone for fear the battery will die on me.

All right, I guess that's it. Happy Friday the Thirteenth, everybody!
vovat: (Default)
Today, I got around to watching last night's Simpsons, and the American Dad and Family Guy from last week. Or was it two weeks ago? I can't remember. It was the AD where Roger played Snot's girlfriend, and the FG with Lois' sister (since when does she have one of those?) married Mayor West. I wonder if the marriage is going to be canonical. As for the most recent Simpsons, you'll notice that they didn't mention that the original Fat Tony had died. Since this guy presumably wasn't a widower and instead had a wife who looked to be much younger than him, I guess anyone who cares about continuity is supposed to assume this is the former Fit Tony. It was kind of weird that they referenced Koyaanisqatsi, since [livejournal.com profile] bethje just recently added that to our Netflix queue. They've actually made quite a few Philip Glass references on the show, though. The Bart and Lisa subplot was amusing, but I kind of wish it had tied in at least slightly with the main plot. I mean, both involved Italian-Americans, right? Also, have you noticed how, since the Simpsons Movie, every pig they've shown has had the little tuft of hair?

I don't think any of them did before that, although I guess we don't know for sure what's under Sir Oinks-A-Lot's hat.


Since I was working last night, however, I missed the television show everyone was talking about, which I believe was called We Got Bin Laden. Seriously, though, Beth texted me about it, and I came home and pretty much immediately made a joke on Twitter about how it might have been a lookalike instead, only to be admonished by at least two different people who said they'd already DNA-tested the body. I guess that'll show me to make a bad joke before getting the facts. At least I wasn't one of the approximately 20,000 people who said Donald Trump wants to see the death certificate, which was funny the first time, but not so much after that. Anyway, I've seen various opinions on the matter, and I think I agree with the people who say it's a relief, but not really a cause for celebration. I mean, there's a definite sense of closure to finally getting this guy we're supposed to have been after for years, and if anyone deserved to die it's definitely him. And while I'd like for him to have been put on trial, from what I've heard it was entirely his decision to go down fighting instead of surrendering quietly. Still, cheering about someone's death, even that of an utterly horrible person, makes me a little uneasy. I don't feel sorry or anything, just that that sort of seems to be stooping to his level. Oh, well.

Since I'm posting anyway, I might as well go ahead and include this survey that I got from SamuraiFrog.
Read more... )
vovat: (Default)
Why is it that people who make a point of demonstrating how outgoing and friendly they are often turn out to be incredibly standoffish? I mean, if you're always talking about how much fun you have with your friends, but you're totally dismissive of anyone new, how did you make these friends in the first place? Was there a cutoff point in your life, when you just decided, "I'm going to stop making new friends...now." It's a little hard to explain exactly what I mean, but it's strange how many people like this I come across. I guess my thing is that, being the socially awkward person I am, I'm probably not all that friendly. But I do try to be fair to anyone who genuinely wants to converse with me online. As introverted as I am, I WANT to meet new people, especially those who share my interests. So I try not to play favorites when I'm replying to comments and such, you know? I welcome comments from anybody, as long as they're not spammers or trolls. That said, as much as I beg for comments, I'm not always that great at leaving them for others, because I have a fear of rejection. How much can you really reject someone who leaves a comment on a blog? I don't know, but I never said it was a rational fear. The thing is, once I DO work up the courage to comment on another person's stuff and get a reasonably friendly response, I'll often start commenting on everything they write. It's like making the first step is an incredible challenge, but after that the rest is easy. Except it isn't always easy, because I frequently worry that I'm going to offend someone. I have the kind of personality where, if someone is mad at me, I tend to assume they hate me, even if we've gotten along well more often than we've fought. It's really not fair of me, but it's usually how I operate. Maybe there's a part of my mind that would actually PREFER someone to hate me than for me to have to make the effort to make up with them. I don't know. It's just a thought. In my more rational moods, I figure it's unlikely too many people hate me. They might dislike me, sure, but hatred is too active an emotion for people to waste on relative strangers. As much as I respect the rational, however, I can't help feeling otherwise.

In lighter news, I thought the Sunday night cartoon lineup was pretty good. On American Dad, the Jewish farmer with the talking cabbages was funny, if rather bizarre. The Simpsons episode initially struck me as retreading familiar territory, since we already had Bart making an attempt to do magic at the beginning of "The Great Money Caper" (although that ended up taking a quite different turn). As it turned out, though, seeing Lisa become a magician was fun, and the Great Raymondo was actually a sympathetic character. The mockery of Criss Angel was also amusing, as was a repeat appearance by Penn and Teller (and yes, Teller talks, quite a bit actually). Bob's Burgers was good as well, and I find it interesting how many comedians I know from other stuff are voices on the show. Jay Johnston from Mr. Show voices Jimmy Pesto, and Sarah Silverman and her sister Laura the Pesto twins. I can't think of anything specific to say about Family Guy, but I did like it.
vovat: (Default)
I recently wrote a post on Tir na n'Og for my WordPress blog, and it struck me that the Internet is a lot like one of those fairylands where time flows differently. I can look at stuff online for what seems like a few minutes, and it turns out to be a few hours. I guess it isn't quite as bad as when I played The Sims, which was made even more confusing by the fact that the game had its own internal clock. Anyway, I've been checking out some new Tumblrs, as well as revisiting ones I already subscribed to, quite a bit in the past few days. I seem to look at a lot of pages with pin-up pictures nowadays, which kind of strikes me as a hobby it would have made more sense to have when I was single. Not that married guys never ogle other women, but shouldn't it be unnecessary at this point? Even though [livejournal.com profile] bethje has said she doesn't mind me looking at other girls, and she's pretty vocal about what guys she likes, but I still can't help feeling a little guilty. And I wasn't even raised Catholic! I must admit I'm a little envious of couples like my Tumblr-friends SamuraiFrog and Becca, who appear to share a love for pretty girls. In fairness, the only time I went to a burlesque show and a strip club were both with Beth.

Beth is actually away today, seeing Elton John in New York and having an actual social life with our friends [livejournal.com profile] therealtavie and Stephanie. I'm kind of jealous, but I didn't really have the desire to go running off to New York on my two-week break between classes. Besides, I like Elton John, but I'm not the fan Beth is. Seeing him live three times was enough for me. Honestly, I'm kind of gotten over concerts in general, which isn't to say I won't go to any more, but I'll almost certainly attend less. I still have fun while I'm there, but all the waiting and the crowds just get more and more overwhelming as I get older, and it's not like they were any picnic when I was younger either. While years of crippling social awkwardness have made me someone who's fine entertaining myself, I do sometimes wish I had more of a social life. But I don't know how to meet people, and everyone I meet online who seems cool lives far away. Honestly, I'm not really even sure how to socialize online. I used to use Instant Messenger a fair amount when I was in college (that's how Beth and I first became friends), but I don't seem to have the energy for it now. Don't let that discourage you from contacting me if you're interested, but keep in mind that I'll probably have about a hundred other tabs open (I'm only slightly exaggerating here), and might be a little slow to respond. I don't know that people use IM anymore anyway, and I haven't yet tried to figure out Skype.

No new Simpsons tonight, but Bob's Burgers was funny, and I liked the parody of Dumbo's pink elephant scene. That sequence really was creepy, wasn't it? As for Family Guy, it had some good moments, but I think it was one of those episodes that simply used an old cliché rather than doing anything to make fun of it. That's been disturbingly common on that show recently. And now, well, I should probably go to bed before too much longer, but I probably won't. Beth and I both stayed up really late last night, and while I went back to bed after dropping her off at the bus terminal, I didn't get a full night's sleep. Since I didn't get up until the evening, though, I'm not tired now. Oh, what a tangled web we weave when we don't have a regular sleep schedule! Oh, well. At least I only work four hours tomorrow, and Beth has the day off, so I don't have to take her. So in the end, it doesn't really matter a whole lot, does it?
vovat: (Default)
After work yesterday, I took my car to get the oil changed and the air filter replaced, which I probably should have done a while ago. Actually, I'm not entirely sure when I'm supposed to get my oil changed with this car. There's apparently supposed to be a maintenance light that comes on, but I've never seen it, and I've driven it quite a bit. Honestly, I'm not sure how I manage to rack up so many miles on my car. I mean, with my old car, I was sometimes commuting back and forth between Pennsylvania and New Jersey, but I no longer do that. Anyway, I should probably just stick to getting the oil changed every 3000 miles, whether it needs it or not. The thing is, I probably wouldn't have gotten the oil changed then if I'd remembered that [livejournal.com profile] bethje and I were going to a comedy show that night. Oh, well. It ended up working out all right, and now I don't have to drive out there this week.

The show was billed as Eugene Mirman and Pretty Good Friends, and consisted of Eugene, Tom Allen, Kumail Nanjiani, and Reggie Watts. We'd actually seen Reggie before, as he was the opener for Conan O'Brien's tour last summer. Good show, but terrible crowd. I'm not sure I've been to a show that had more hecklers than this one. What the hell, people? I'm sure most of the people there were decent and well-behaved, but there were some bad apples that really spoiled the bunch. They managed to make it work despite the constant interruptions, though, and Beth got Eugene to sign her copy of The Will to Whatevs after the show. It seemed pretty impersonal, though, because Eugene was sitting on a chair onstage while signing stuff. It felt like going to petition the king on his throne. I'm not sure I blame him, though, because with a hostile crowd like that, you probably don't want to get too close to them. Besides, I've never felt that celebrities were required to interact with their audiences after the show. I'm not famous, but I am nervous, and can understand how difficult it is to have to strike up conversations with a bunch of strangers. Also, I didn't think to bring my camera, so I don't have any pictures of the show. I'm sure you're disappointed. :P

Last night's Simpsons episode had a creative premise, but I don't think the story really had much conflict. Even the businessman character, usually a voice for unscrupulous greed on this show, was a decent enough guy in this episode. And the side effect with the eyeballs popping out came across as too ridiculous and gross even for this show. Sure, we've seen gags like that before, especially with Mr. Burns, but they were typically isolated, not made central to the episode like the eye thing. The jokes varied in quality. I thought the child-proof cap door on the pharmaceutical headquarters was a good bit of absurd humor, but a lot of the animal stuff in the desert had more or less been done before. Not a terrible episode, but perhaps a little too bizarre for its own good. As for Family Guy, I found it pretty rehashed. Does every episode featuring Meg have to be about her becoming disturbingly obsessive? And while I liked the meta-reference about Stewie not being as evil anymore, the clone plot was clichéd enough that even the characters themselves acknowledged it.

Right now (okay, not quite RIGHT now, since what I'm doing at the moment is typing this post), I'm working on my annotated bibliography for one of my classes. I think I've found a good selection of articles, but my concern is that I don't have as much of an overarching theme as the professor would like. I mean, I HAVE a theme, but it's a little haphazard. We'll see what happens, I guess. It's due tomorrow, so I can't afford to be too picky.
vovat: (Neko)
This past weekend, [livejournal.com profile] bethje and I finally got around to watching the Netflix movies that had been sitting around the house for weeks. One was My Baby Is Black and Checkerboard, a double feature of French exploitation films that were pretty boring, and we ended up not watching all of either of them. The other was Rocky IV, which was pretty heavy on the Cold War propaganda. I mean, Ivan Drago is a terse, pitiless, steroid-addicted, government-promoted freak. How much more anti-Soviet can you get? Another reflection of its mid-eighties release date was that a robot appeared, and for no apparent reason at that.

Other viewing so far this week has included Fox's Sunday night lineup. I found the American Dad episode, with Andy Dick moving in with the Smiths, to be rather reminiscent of the Family Guy where James Woods moved in with the Griffins. It seemed like Woods being a lunatic was kind of absurd, however, while as far as I can tell Andy Dick really IS a lunatic. I don't think he did his own voice, either, while Woods did. The conflict in the Simpsons episode, with Homer stealing the glory for Bart's accomplishment, never amounted to much, but I think the real highlight of the episode was how many different kinds of animation they parodied. Also, we got a few appearances by celebrities who did riffs on how annoyingly self-absorbed they are. I generally like Ricky Gervais pretty well, but his bit went on a little long. I've also heard that, since he's lost weight, he's started hassling other people about being overweight. What the hell, Ricky? Actually, his part in the Simpsons episode made a good point about that, which is that we CAN'T all afford physical trainers. But anyway, yeah, not much plot to the episode, but pretty fun anyway. And I like that they brought back Angry Dad instead of coming up with a new reason for Bart and Homer to be famous. I also liked the Family Guy episode, but I was probably mostly just amused by the bad pun of the guy who went by "Gutentag" having the real name "Schlechtnacht." The old man fight was funny, too.

I really should start to plan things out more in advance. There's an event in New York tomorrow, I kind of want to go to, with both Michael Showalter and Neko Case at a bookstore. I have to work tomorrow night, though, and now it looks like Beth won't be going either. I have to wonder what it'll be like, though. I mean, I'm a fan of both Michael and Neko, but they're from different worlds! What's next, Frank Black performing at Oz convention? Wouldn't that be awesome? Well, maybe only for me. By the way, Neko is on Twitter, and she does a lot of retweeting, but hasn't retweeted anything of mine yet! I have to suspect that the retweets are all of people she knows personally, but it would be a pretty big thing for me if she DID acknowledge something I wrote. I'm sure the other 7397 people who follow her but she doesn't follow back feel the same way, though.
vovat: (Default)
I guess I should say something about Valentine's Day. I've never been one to make a big deal out of it, but hey, it IS a holiday, right? I took [livejournal.com profile] bethje out to eat at the Olive Garden, or rather she took me out. I mean, I drove, but she paid. It was actually not as good as usual; I know Beth was unsatisfied with the calamari, and I thought the pear and Gorgonzola ravioli with shrimp was rather too sweet. Yeah, I know a lot of people hate the Olive Garden anyway, but we generally like it. Oh, and when I was in the bathroom, I overheard some guys complaining about Valentine's Day, and one of them said it was for women. I can't say I really understand where that stereotype comes from, but there you go. Actually, I suppose it's true for me, because I don't think I'd do anything if Beth didn't want to. Anyway, I gave her a copy of Twilight Princess, and she gave me Bucketheads in Oz and the complete Monty Python's Flying Circus DVD set. And at night, I worked, then returned home and did some homework. Fun, huh?

Today, I got around to watching the Sunday night lineup, which Beth had taped for me because I was working when it was on. Not bad, but nothing exceptional this time either. When watching the Simpsons episode, I was about to object and say that Marge already had gray hair (since she was seventeen, according to Homer in "Secrets of a Successful Marriage"), but they actually got around that by saying that the fumes from the dye made her forget about it. And it's always cool when Adam Carolla shows up as the Grim Reaper on Family Guy.

I don't really have anything else to report just now. I have class tonight, but nothing to do tomorrow (well, aside from reading for school), so that's cool. I might as well go ahead and post this now.

Ringless

Jan. 13th, 2011 01:19 pm
vovat: (Default)
Well, I lost my wedding ring. It was a little loose on my finger anyway, and it must have come off at some point while I was working at Walmart. I'm afraid it ended up in someone's bag, and I'll probably never see it again. If I'd had it engraved, then that might have made it easier to find. Am I the first person to ever do this? People losing their wedding rings isn't something you hear about, but it must have happened at some point, right? I guess I'll want to replace it at some point, but I don't have the money now. It really makes me sad, and my finger feels naked without it. I can't help but think I'm one of the most careless people around. Anyway, if anyone reading this has come across a golden wedding band within the last day, let me know.

Honestly, I feel like I'm kidding myself when I say I'll do things when I get the money. I don't feel I'll ever be making enough money to keep my head above water with someone else's help, and even on the off chance that I do, there's just too much I have to spend money on. Speaking of spending money, I really should find a way to get a picture of [livejournal.com profile] bethje and myself into the locket I gave her for Christmas. I'm terrible at planning these things out. I guess that's one reason why we never had our wedding rings engraved, either. Not that it matters at this point, at least for me, I suppose.

Last night, I finally got around to watching the cartoon lineup from Sunday night. The Simpsons episode was pretty good. We've seen Marge trying to have a social life before, but this one had an interesting new take on it. I also liked how the back story was revealed a little bit at a time, and they really captured the awkwardness of Homer being forced to hang out with Marge's friends' husbands. Bob's Burgers was all right, but didn't really grab me. I'll probably give it another shot or two before giving up on it, though. And the Family Guy episode really took a turn for the tragic, didn't it? I mean, it was obvious they weren't going to kill off either Brian or Peter, but they waited until the last minute before revealing the twist. I'm kind of glad they acknowledged at the end that transplanting dog kidneys into a human is ridiculous. Then again, it really seems to vary whether Brian is more human or canine. I mean, if he can talk and walk upright, it isn't that far-fetched that his kidneys could work for a person, right?
vovat: (santa)
Well, it was another weekend of working, sleeping, and trying in vain to come up with ideas for my Digital Preservation paper. I didn't even get to use the Internet all that much. I do have some thoughts on last night's cartoon lineup, though.

Since the Simpsons episode had four stories instead of the typical three, they really weren't able to develop any particular segment, but I'd say that's probably all right. Most of them really only had one joke anyway. I liked the Polar Express segment with Bart, especially for its visuals. I was amused by the depressed atmosphere at the North Pole, and some of the background sight gags. I remember seeing Bumble from Rudolph as a janitor, and I think there were a few other such references I've forgotten. I do wish they'd called attention to the fact that they had a Jewish guy playing the role of Santa. Lisa's dream was probably the most involved story, in that they actually took it beyond one basic joke, but at the same time it was the most forgettable of the four. Was the story about World War II and Christmas trees based on anything in particular? It seems like it would have been, but if so it's not a movie (or whatever) I've seen. I did like the Inglourious Basterds reference at the end, and Lisa's reaction to the dream. Incidentally, I believe Nellie McKay, whom I'll be seeing live next week, has a song against cutting down Christmas trees. She played it at the Aimee Mann show that [livejournal.com profile] bethje and I attended two years ago. Getting back to The Simpsons, the Martha Stewart bit went back to being one basic joke, but it was pretty funny, at least for a while. The puppet segment was probably the most heavily advertised, and with good reason, since doing an entire segment of an animated show in another fashion is kind of a big deal. It's probably good that the segment didn't last very long, but I enjoyed the riffs on the Muppets and Sesame Street. I wasn't sure why they had a laugh track, but I just looked it up and found that The Muppet Show used one, so I guess that's what they were going for. I have no idea why they chose Katy Perry for the live-action guest star, but her dating Puppet Moe actually kind of makes sense. I mean, he's the same basic type as Russell Brand, right? {g}


I found it odd that the TV listings had a block for an hour-long Cleveland Show, when it was really two separate episodes, the second one having nothing to do with the holidays at all. Also, they really played up the crossover aspect in the commercials when all we actually got was a few minutes of Peter, Joe, and Quagmire. They've done more substantial crossovers between the two casts in the past. Did they advertise the Family Guy episode with the search for the source of dirty jokes, which featured Cleveland's family and the David Lynch bartender, in the same way? I can't remember. Mind you, advertising the Cleveland Show in the first place is probably kind of pointless, since I'm sure I'm not alone in really only watching it because it's on in between two other shows I actually like. As for American Dad, I'm not sure why they didn't do a holiday episode, but I can't remember whether there's been one in every previous season or just a few of them. I do remember those episodes being quite good, though. Anyway, I did like the episode, especially Stan's excitement at being on jury duty. I did find it a little hard to believe that Stan wouldn't have known who the defendant was until AFTER the jury had been selected; I've been called up for jury duty three times, and while I was never selected, I know that's not how it works. Speaking of American Dad, I had a dream a few nights ago in which Roger appeared, wearing one of his disguises. I believe it was the same night that I dreamed about having a class at my old elementary school, and having cats in the car with me for some reason. At one point [livejournal.com profile] not_glimmer showed up and told me I should just leave the cats in the car, but I don't think she was in the class itself.
vovat: (Default)
You know, when I buy presents for [livejournal.com profile] bethje and then she has to help me pay my bills, it seems like it kind of defeats the purpose. It's like I'm a kid, and she gives me some money to buy her a gift. At least I'm able to pay more of my bills than before now that I have a job, but being poor sucks. I miss still having some of the money my family put away for college. And now Christmas is coming up, and I don't know what I'm going to do about that. Anyway, enough of that. Let's delve into television.


The Simpsons: The Fool Monty - I didn't think this was a particularly good episode, but I guess it had its moments. Smithers working for Dick Cheney was a clever idea, for instance. The meeting of the news media at the beginning was amusing, but didn't really build to much. Nobody but Burns and Smithers ended up being vaccinated, but everyone else just forgot about it. It was basically just a way to show how much everyone in town hates Mr. Burns, but we already knew that. I don't think it was entirely coincidental that they referenced the movie in the episode being aired shortly before the film's network premiere, and I liked how the characters admitted it really didn't make any sense. I think that joke might have worked better if Burns had gone on to have other plans that had already been done in the show's past, though.


The Futurama Holiday Spectacular - I kind of wonder why they didn't bring the What-If Machine back for this one, but maybe it would have been too difficult to fit it in. All three segments had the same basic theme of reviving a long-lost holiday tradition, and the lack of pine trees and petroleum were already referenced in earlier episodes, so that was a nice bit of continuity (even though this episode was out of continuity). I have to wonder why they didn't seek petroleum on another planet instead of drilling into the Earth, but I guess that wouldn't have been as funny. I'm also curious as to whether they're going to make Cheney (hey, two Cheney appearances in one night, on different channels but both on shows created by Matt Groening) being Nixon's Vice President into a regular thing on the show. What happened to Agnew's headless body, anyway? Speaking of Vice Presidents, there was quite a bit of Al Gore in this one, which I consider a good thing, but your mileage may vary.

I don't feel like doing a full-fledged Family Guy review, but I did like the way they edited Brian into the Real Time with Bill Maher set, even though I'm still not used to having live-action segments in an animated show. Conway Twitty is one thing, but this is quite another. Speaking of Real Time, why is it impossible to find the next to the last episode, in which Bill O'Reilly appeared, in reruns or On Demand? Was it pulled for some reason, or is it just a weird glitch?
vovat: (zoma)
Another year, another Simpsons Treehouse of Horror that airs too late. Hey, Major League Baseball, if you're so intent on having a game on Halloween, can't you at least have the players wear costumes or something? Anyway, the opening was kind of all over the place, but I'm glad they didn't stick with the fight between Homer and Bart. The Monster Mifflin sequence basically came out of nowhere, but I still liked it, and it was a good play on how people are always saying The Office is just like where they work. Yeah, I'm sure. The board game segment felt pretty similar to the old advertising mascot story, but had enough amusing jokes and clever bits of animation that it was decent despite the rehashed feeling. "Master and Cadaver" seemed too long and convoluted to make an effective Halloween segment, and it probably didn't help that I wasn't at all familiar with the source material. [livejournal.com profile] bethje told me what it was most likely parodying, but I've already forgotten. I think the only really memorable thing about it was that they did the whole sequence with Marge in a bikini. Not that I'm into cartoon characters or anything, but it was interesting. As for "Tweenlight," well, Twilight is pretty much a parody of itself as far as I can tell, but it was still funny. Actually, one of the most amusing things might be that the parody stuck much closer to the traditional view of vampires than Stephenie Meyer does.

What else? I watched the Family Guy and American Dad Halloween episodes as well, but I don't think I'll bother reviewing them. I did think the FG episode included a surprising number of subplots, even if one was basically just a gross-out incest joke. Have either of these shows done Halloween stories before? If so, it's certainly not typical. Oh, and it's kind of a weird coincidence that both the Simpsons and FG episodes did fairly long runs on not avoiding the use of brand names. Of course, both shows have mentioned actual brands in the past, so I'm not sure how the rules work.

In other news, I finished with my institutional report and my last discussion question for my Intro to Archives course, so I think that's all the writing I'll have to do until the final exam. Too bad I have no idea what my paper for Digital Preservation will be about. These classes go by so quickly on Drexel's quarter system. I'm signed up to take one on-campus and one online course again next quarter, by the way.
vovat: (Default)
Holy Thoth, school is kicking my ass. For my Digital Preservation class, I had two assignments that took me much longer than I thought they would. One was just a short answer thing, but it took me a long time to find the answer, and I don't even know that it's correct. The other one is an XML project that, once again, was really brief, but I kept making small mistakes. That's probably the main reason I couldn't stick with computer programming when I studied it in college. It's just too easy for one error to screw everything up, which gets so frustrating. Also, I wasn't able to get into Drexel's file transfer application, and the help desk wasn't open on Sunday. According to the regular hours, it was supposed to be, but I guess they either closed early or didn't open because of the upcoming holiday. I managed to get through today, but really, don't you think a college help desk should be open all the time? I've been through a considerable amount of college, and I know for a fact that students do their work at all hours of the day. That class hasn't been all that bad so far, but it has the liability for me of using technical jargon, which tends to make my eyes glaze over. It's also my first totally online class, so there's that adjustment to make as well.

Sunday night's Simpsons episode was pretty good. The premise was that Lisa volunteered to coach Bart's Little League team, and was actually good at it, using statistics and calculations to figure out the best moves. Bart decided this wasn't fun, and this set up the conflict. Some of my favorite parts were the nerds trying to determine how many beers they needed to order, and Homer and Marge's dueling bedtime stories. I was also glad that they referenced Mike Scioscia's earlier appearance on the show. It is odd that Lisa would be concerned about extracurricular activities when every other episode shows her involved in some new project, but I guess that's Lisa for you.

I watched Family Guy, American Dad, and part of Cleveland as well, but don't have a lot to say about them. It does seem like FG is getting away from the constant cutaway gags and focusing more on story. Unfortunately, story is rarely the strong point on the show. The particular episode, involving Peter catching Carter cheating on Babs, was all right, but not great. I guess Peter has changed his mind on Babs's attractiveness. American Dad's clone plot was a clever twist on the clichéd premise of parents disagreeing how to raise a kid, and while the resolution was predictable, the journey there certainly wasn't. I wonder what they're going to do with Hayley and Jeff in future episodes, although I have to suspect they'll go back to Langley Falls now that they've spent most of the money they conned from Stan in trying to escape from Roger.

Also, [livejournal.com profile] bethje made me watch Human Centipede: The First Sequence, which was surprisingly less gross than I thought it would be. The premise is that a crazy German scientist connects three people by means of their gastrointestinal systems, which means that all but the front would eat poop. As it turned out, though, there was only one brief scene that addressed this point, the focus instead being more on the human centipede's attempts to escape the doctor. There were a lot of plot holes, as the assembled centipede would just show up in a room with no explanation as to how it got there, especially since climbing stairs is later shown to be particularly difficult for the creature. Does the doctor carry the three of them? Do they teleport in like Mega Man? It's never explained, nor is how the villain expects the back segments to last for more than a week or so when given nothing to eat other than feces. So, yeah, it didn't make any sense, but it was still interesting to watch, and not as disturbing as I would have guessed.

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15 161718192021
22232425 262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 30th, 2025 07:41 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios