All I've got is a photograph
Jan. 11th, 2005 01:05 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Last night,
bethje, Dorothea, and I went out to eat at Chili's. That took care of the second of the four gift cards my dad gave us for Christmas. After that, Beth and I watched TV for a while, and then I went to bed. I ended up having weird dreams about a video game where you had to fight a monster inside a grave (certainly not something unheard of). Then there was something about a party, and some being that could change forms but needed to have its eyes replaced with each new form, or something like that. There was also a dream where
colleenanne lived in Beth's basement, and we overheard her calling
jazzsammich on the phone. (That last sentence sounds like it could be the result of one of those quiz things that plugs in random people from your friends list. But no, it was all the result of my own mind.)
I've been having trouble with Yahoo Groups bouncing my e-mails. I have no idea why this would be the case, but I'm hoping I can fix it by having the mail sent to my actual e-mail address, rather than my tmbg.org forwarding address. Has anyone else who uses a tmbg.org address been having problems like this?
I'm thinking of getting a camera, but I'm not sure whether to get the old-fashioned or the digital kind. Any recommendations?
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
I've been having trouble with Yahoo Groups bouncing my e-mails. I have no idea why this would be the case, but I'm hoping I can fix it by having the mail sent to my actual e-mail address, rather than my tmbg.org forwarding address. Has anyone else who uses a tmbg.org address been having problems like this?
I'm thinking of getting a camera, but I'm not sure whether to get the old-fashioned or the digital kind. Any recommendations?
no subject
Date: 2005-01-11 07:28 pm (UTC)The big downside is just not having physical pictures to touch. You may think you'll print out all you favorites, but most people don't. It's not always as much fun to have everyone gather around a monitor to look at you pictures, but I think that's a small price to pay, since it is easily remedied should that actually bother you.
Oh, the only other downside for our camera is that it cannot take action shots. This is probably not true of all digital cameras, but ours takes about 2 seconds to actually take the picture after the button is pressed, meaning you have to anticipate a bit.
We still have a 1.3 MegaPixel camera and really should upgrade at some point, since the prices keep dropping on higher quality cameras. Even that is good enough for printing up to 8x10's, depending on your printer quality.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-12 02:04 pm (UTC)Can you have them put on regular film and/or photographs if you'd like, though? I mean, a printout on regular paper isn't exactly the same, even if you DO get around to it.
Also, how much do you think a decent digital camera would sell for these days?
no subject
Date: 2005-01-12 03:46 pm (UTC)As far as film, you have a couple of options. You can buy special film-quality paper for your printer (glossy and flat are both available). I've tried that and it usually prints out really well. Also, most camera shops (as well as the photo departments of a lot of Target/K-Mart/Wal-Mart stores) will print your pictures on high quality paper for a small fee per picture. You just bring them the image on your media card or a 3.5" disk.
For more money, I've also seen a lot of adds lately for special photo printers that read images directly from your camera and print borderless 3x5 or 4x6 prints.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-12 10:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-11 07:56 pm (UTC)So, in sum, I ♥ my digital camera. I would never go back to a regular one. Oh, and I have a Canon S200 which I got more than two years ago so it's pretty ancient, but I'd definitely recommend a Canon—mine has served me very well.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-12 10:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-12 11:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-12 05:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-12 02:09 pm (UTC)