Since fellow Oz fans Jared and Douglas have both addressed the issue of religion in Oz, I might as well offer my own take on the subject. Not surprisingly, the Oz books tend to be quiet on the subject of religion, but they never specifically say there isn't any, either. Since death is somewhere between very rare and totally non-existent (depending on which book you're reading), the afterlife probably isn't of much concern to Ozites, but other aspects of religion might be. Mythology certainly seems to be alive there, the only difference being that we're told in the authorial voice that this mythology is (at least for the most part) true. But does everyone know that? Sure, Ozma and Glinda have met Lurline, but I doubt the same is the case for Jo Schmo of Oogaboo (famous for his schmo trees). Someone in Oz might well come upon a minor fairy, or perhaps run into Polychrome on one of her visits to Earth, but Lurline and Ak are most likely not personal acquaintances of most Ozites.
The Life and Adventures of Santa Claus gives the most details on the beings behind the running of L. Frank Baum's fantasy universe, and the impression given is that they have no desire to be worshipped, or even acknowledged by mankind. But does that necessarily mean they aren't? I mean, if you were a farmer (and that seems to be the most common profession in Oz) who had learned that there was a fairy in charge of the world's rain, might you not thank him for allowing your crops to grow, or call for his attention when it hasn't been raining? Whether this would actually affect the Rain King's activities is more or less unimportant in this situation.
While I believe the only place of worship mentioned in Baum's Oz books is the china church in the first story, Ruth Plumly Thompson makes several references to churches, christenings, Christmas, and Christendom. Does this mean that Christianity has taken hold in Oz, or are these perhaps rough translations of more Oz-specific terms? Maybe, for instance, an Ozian "christening" is actually a dedication of a new baby to Lurline? I'll say more about the Ozish language later (possibly next week), but the general impression given is that English is now the common language of Oz, but it wasn't always. Then again, maybe it was missionaries who brought English to Oz in the first place, and they also introduced Christianity. Mind you, even if Christianity IS a significant religion in Oz, it's almost certainly quite different from any denomination in the Great Outside World. But considering how many different nature fairies we see in the books, I have to wonder if a pagan religion is more likely. Or maybe religion just never really caught on in Oz. Who knows? Gregory Maguire's books have a monotheistic religion called Unionism becoming mainstream in place of ancient Lurlinism, but I see this as yet another way in which Maguire seeks to make his books different from the originals.
The Life and Adventures of Santa Claus gives the most details on the beings behind the running of L. Frank Baum's fantasy universe, and the impression given is that they have no desire to be worshipped, or even acknowledged by mankind. But does that necessarily mean they aren't? I mean, if you were a farmer (and that seems to be the most common profession in Oz) who had learned that there was a fairy in charge of the world's rain, might you not thank him for allowing your crops to grow, or call for his attention when it hasn't been raining? Whether this would actually affect the Rain King's activities is more or less unimportant in this situation.
While I believe the only place of worship mentioned in Baum's Oz books is the china church in the first story, Ruth Plumly Thompson makes several references to churches, christenings, Christmas, and Christendom. Does this mean that Christianity has taken hold in Oz, or are these perhaps rough translations of more Oz-specific terms? Maybe, for instance, an Ozian "christening" is actually a dedication of a new baby to Lurline? I'll say more about the Ozish language later (possibly next week), but the general impression given is that English is now the common language of Oz, but it wasn't always. Then again, maybe it was missionaries who brought English to Oz in the first place, and they also introduced Christianity. Mind you, even if Christianity IS a significant religion in Oz, it's almost certainly quite different from any denomination in the Great Outside World. But considering how many different nature fairies we see in the books, I have to wonder if a pagan religion is more likely. Or maybe religion just never really caught on in Oz. Who knows? Gregory Maguire's books have a monotheistic religion called Unionism becoming mainstream in place of ancient Lurlinism, but I see this as yet another way in which Maguire seeks to make his books different from the originals.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-21 03:58 am (UTC)(Bit of a disclaimer, my book-Oz is strictly from Baum, so I don't take Thompson's into account. Nothing against those who do, I just don't.)
no subject
Date: 2009-01-21 07:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-21 11:38 pm (UTC)Incidentally, in Handy Mandy, one of the villain's agents disguises himself as a monk with a shaved head who speaks a foreign language. In order for the disguise to be effective, such people would presumably have to actually exist in Oz.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-23 03:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-21 11:41 am (UTC)Could be, but there are plenty of societies that we wouldn't necessarily call civilized, but have religious beliefs.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-21 07:31 am (UTC)Thompson was, I suppose, a product of her upbringing. I'd just as soon assume there's no religion *or* politics in Oz, although I'm up for a little sex.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-21 11:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-21 11:50 am (UTC)Sure there's politics. There was even an election, although I still haven't read that book, yet. And if the Winkies wanted the Tinman as their ruler, wouldn't there have had to be a way to confirm they really did want them? Jinjur's revolution was a form of politics too, I'd think.
Maybe I'll put all three of the touchy subjects in my book, just to see how many traditionalists I can piss off ...
no subject
Date: 2009-01-21 11:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-23 03:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-24 12:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-24 07:43 am (UTC)Or maybe we're just thinking of this in a far too "civilized world" kind of way.