Writer's Block: Sheldon and Penny 4ever!
May. 12th, 2010 10:41 am[Error: unknown template qotd]
While I'm never opposed to it, I tend to think some fandoms really support it more than others do. I've written Oz fanfiction myself, although most of that was prior to ever having heard the term "fanfiction." I think the common term back in the pre-Internet days was "pastiche," although I feel that this is really only appropriate when you're purposely trying to ape the original writer's style. I think the fact that the publishers found other writers to continue the series after L. Frank Baum's death means it always kind of came across as a collaborative effort to me. Even Baum wrote in his introductions about using ideas from readers. Since many of the books are now in the public domain, that means there have been some professionally published fan-written Oz books. On the other hand, I know there's Discworld fanfic, and I can't bring myself to read any of that. It just seems to me that Terry Pratchett's own style is integral to those stories, and stuff written about the same universe by someone else just wouldn't be the same. Then again, maybe that's how I would have felt about Oz books by anyone other than Baum if I'd lived in the early part of the twentieth century. I guess a lot of it is precedent.
As far as TV-based fanfic goes, I really don't read it, but since TV shows are usually collaborative efforts anyway, I don't think I'd have the "not the original writer" objection to it. I'm just not really interested, even if it's based on shows I like. Overall, though, if you like the characters and want them to have other adventures, I don't see any problem with writing them yourself. I'm not entirely sure why it's so popular among fanfic writers to make unlikely characters have sex, but even then I think the important thing is making sure they remain in character. If you're going to make the established characters act like they wouldn't really act in anything other than a parody, why even use those characters?
While I'm never opposed to it, I tend to think some fandoms really support it more than others do. I've written Oz fanfiction myself, although most of that was prior to ever having heard the term "fanfiction." I think the common term back in the pre-Internet days was "pastiche," although I feel that this is really only appropriate when you're purposely trying to ape the original writer's style. I think the fact that the publishers found other writers to continue the series after L. Frank Baum's death means it always kind of came across as a collaborative effort to me. Even Baum wrote in his introductions about using ideas from readers. Since many of the books are now in the public domain, that means there have been some professionally published fan-written Oz books. On the other hand, I know there's Discworld fanfic, and I can't bring myself to read any of that. It just seems to me that Terry Pratchett's own style is integral to those stories, and stuff written about the same universe by someone else just wouldn't be the same. Then again, maybe that's how I would have felt about Oz books by anyone other than Baum if I'd lived in the early part of the twentieth century. I guess a lot of it is precedent.
As far as TV-based fanfic goes, I really don't read it, but since TV shows are usually collaborative efforts anyway, I don't think I'd have the "not the original writer" objection to it. I'm just not really interested, even if it's based on shows I like. Overall, though, if you like the characters and want them to have other adventures, I don't see any problem with writing them yourself. I'm not entirely sure why it's so popular among fanfic writers to make unlikely characters have sex, but even then I think the important thing is making sure they remain in character. If you're going to make the established characters act like they wouldn't really act in anything other than a parody, why even use those characters?
no subject
Date: 2010-05-12 02:49 pm (UTC)Word to your opinion, btw.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-12 03:02 pm (UTC)But then there comes the controversial issue of RPF and all the potential creepiness that fanficition involving real people involves. What about when there is no original author of any kind?
I obviously don't have a problem with it as long as it's not getting shoved in the actor's/whatevers' faces, but within fandoms where RPF is big it can get a little strange when this warped sense of fanon starts to interfere with how celebrities are treated or thought about.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-12 05:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-12 05:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-12 10:44 pm (UTC)So, real people fiction disturbing... what's your take on real people as MINOR characters? You know, like, if a famous and incidentally dead rock star happens to have a superhero for a nephew or something weird like that. ;)
no subject
Date: 2010-05-13 12:12 am (UTC)As for the movie, I'm sure there's plenty of fanfic based on that, but it's really outside my area of expertise. As the authors make no attempt to be consistent with Baum's work, it could never be official in my mind. Besides, the movie is still under copyright.
So, real people fiction disturbing... what's your take on real people as MINOR characters? You know, like, if a famous and incidentally dead rock star happens to have a superhero for a nephew or something weird like that.
I don't know if it's completely consistent, but I think having real people appear in minor roles is fine. It would pretty much kill historical fiction to do otherwise, wouldn't it?
no subject
Date: 2010-05-13 05:49 am (UTC)I'm pretty involved in American Idol fandom for example and it's extra crazy because not only does all this stuff happen, but the subjects have no training in how to handle any of it because they're essentially random losers off the street. LOL.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-13 06:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-13 11:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-14 06:01 am (UTC)