Date: 2009-11-13 11:01 pm (UTC)
The project is problematic right from the start with their insistence on basing the "conservative" Bible on the King James Version, which their own entry on the KJV admits has its flaws. Why? Because it's public domain. So are old texts of fairy tales.
If we are truly to have a "trustworthy" translation, even with the stated political-right bias, the only honest way to do it is with original texts. Contrary to these people's beliefs, Jesus, Paul, etc. did not speak in Elizabethan (Jamesian?) English. Jesus and Pals spoke Aramaic and Jesus (being called a Rabbi) probably spoke a lot of Hebrew as well -- their adventures were first written in Greek. Then there's the Old Testament, written in old Hebrew dialects that scholars in Synagogues no doubt still argue over. But hey, a bunch of English gentlemen (who probably had NO agenda at all nor were influenced to write anything in a certain way by a man who could order their execution at any moment) definitely got it right and we, completely fluent and understanding of the dialect Shakespeare wrote in, can safely write a "correct" translation. Yeahright.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14 151617181920
212223242526 27
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 9th, 2026 06:54 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios