Insurance Inconvenience
Aug. 28th, 2008 02:08 pmAnyway, here are some memes regarding my LJ itself. I think I've done these before, but since they're subject to change, I felt I might as well do them again.
So, vovat, your LiveJournal reveals...
You are... 0% unique and 19% herdlike (partly because you, like everyone else, enjoy writing). When it comes to friends you are popular. In terms of the way you relate to people, you believe in give and take. Your writing style (based on a recent public entry) is intellectual.
Your overall weirdness is: 26
(The average level of weirdness is: 28.
You are weirder than 59% of other LJers.)
Find out what your weirdness level is!
The Blogalyser reveals...
Your blog/web page text has an overall readability index of 14.
This suggests that your writing style is conventional
(to communicate well you should aim for a figure between 10 and 20).Your blog has 48 sentences per entry, which suggests your general message is distinguished by verbosity
(writing for the web should be concise).
CHARACTER MATRIX
| male | female | |
| self | world | |
| past | future |
Your text shows characteristics which are 56% male and 44% female
(for more information see the Gender Genie).
Looking at pronoun indicators, you write mainly about yourself, then the world in general and finally your social circle. Also, your writing focuses primarily on the present, next the past and lastly the future.
Find out what your blogging style is like!
I think I commented on this before, but who decided that "writing for the web should be concise"? Is that some kind of rule? I mean, I guess it's usually better to avoid unnecessary verbosity, but what if I were writing for a website with a minimum word count for articles? Besides, a large number of sentences doesn't necessarily mean a person is verbose; they could just be addressing a lot of topics in the same entry. That said, I AM rather verbose, I'm sure.
And finally, the comment statistics again:
Generated by LJ Comment Stats.
Hey, are any of the people who commented but aren't LJ-friends of mine (including the anonymous ones) still reading this journal? If so, why not let me know? I'm always curious about such things.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-28 09:17 pm (UTC)I always wonder how those stats would change, at least in my case, if it took friends-locked entries into account....
no subject
Date: 2008-08-28 10:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-29 03:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-29 05:07 pm (UTC)Also, haha, you are 0% unique!
no subject
Date: 2008-08-29 07:05 pm (UTC)