On the Record
Jun. 9th, 2007 08:34 amBoth the
tmbg and
ladypilot communities have mentioned upcoming vinyl releases. I wouldn't think there would be that much of a market for that kind of thing nowadays, but apparently there's enough of one, because I've seen other recent albums on vinyl as well. I know a lot of people say vinyl records sound better, and that might be true if they're in pristine condition (I've never done a comparison myself, but I assume the audiophiles know what they're talking about), but the fact that you can't listen to them without running a needle over them means they're not going to remain in that condition for very long. And when I think about it, it's kind of weird when you have some people predicting the end of physical recording media, yet there's still a significant number of consumers who are clamoring to buy new albums in a basically obsolete physical format. Personally, I haven't had a record player in years. I used to have one as a kid, but I pretty much stopped using it once we got a cassette player. I think it no longer works, or my mom gave it away, or both. I wouldn't mind getting a new one someday, but I doubt I'll be buying The Else on vinyl.
Recently, I've been going back and tagging old entries. I'd already done that when LiveJournal first introduced tags, but I later thought of a few more I wanted to use, so I started going back and applying them. That was about a year ago, and I think I've finally finished. I don't intend to do it again, though, so you'll have to be content with the current tags on my old posts. While going through, I occasionally fixed typos or links. More often than not, however, the links were totally dead, which sucks for archiving purposes. I doubt anyone is looking at those old posts anyway, though. When I add a new person as a friend on LJ, I'll usually read all of the posts that are currently on their front page, but no more, barring exceptional circumstances (e.g., a tag that I find particularly intriguing, or a link in a new post to an old one). I would imagine that a lot of other people don't even do that. I guess the newer tags were more for my own benefit than anyone else's.
Well, now that I'm done cleaning up my old journal entries, I should probably start cleaning up my actual room. Really, it's not that bad, but I still need to go through the stuff my mom brought over on her last visit.
Recently, I've been going back and tagging old entries. I'd already done that when LiveJournal first introduced tags, but I later thought of a few more I wanted to use, so I started going back and applying them. That was about a year ago, and I think I've finally finished. I don't intend to do it again, though, so you'll have to be content with the current tags on my old posts. While going through, I occasionally fixed typos or links. More often than not, however, the links were totally dead, which sucks for archiving purposes. I doubt anyone is looking at those old posts anyway, though. When I add a new person as a friend on LJ, I'll usually read all of the posts that are currently on their front page, but no more, barring exceptional circumstances (e.g., a tag that I find particularly intriguing, or a link in a new post to an old one). I would imagine that a lot of other people don't even do that. I guess the newer tags were more for my own benefit than anyone else's.
Well, now that I'm done cleaning up my old journal entries, I should probably start cleaning up my actual room. Really, it's not that bad, but I still need to go through the stuff my mom brought over on her last visit.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-09 02:58 pm (UTC)But yeah. The Audiophiles are right, but it's mostly in old album cases, and less so now, as most folks _realize_ this now and are actually remastering older albums. So... yeah. It's one of those things, where in my experience, with a remastered album, the vinyl version will either be the same or a skosh better, but not really enough to be "OH NOES!!!" about. New stuff -- I dunno. I've got the Sgt. Major record on both CD and Vinyl, though:
a) Kurt actually did record/master that one on Analog
and
b) The CD sounds real good anwyay and the main reason I got the LP is for the bonus 7", anyway.
I <3 vinyl!
Date: 2007-06-09 03:10 pm (UTC)I've heard several theories on why vinyl releases are becoming more popular. the most intriguing one is that it's because they have no DRM. You can hook your computer up to your sound system and, with a little bit of software, rip high-quality recording that are completely DRM-free.
Plus, a some of the new vinyl releases also come with free codes to download a digital copy of the album. So, you're not losing out on portability. The new Polyphonic Spree vinyl is going to be released like that. I know that Camera Obsucura did it too.
Hopefully, bands will continue the trend of vinyl releases because I love them! The last time I went to the record store downtown, the clerk (I think he's the manager because he's always there) was telling me that they sell a ton of new vinyl releases. Apparently, there are a lot more people buying them than a few years ago. the store has always had a good selection of vinyl, but they've been beefing it up to compensate for the demand.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-09 04:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-10 12:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-10 03:18 am (UTC)Re: I <3 vinyl!
Date: 2007-06-10 03:22 am (UTC)That makes sense. I'm probably one of those people who wouldn't really be able to tell too much difference; but then, as I said, I haven't actually done a comparison. I know that, when people complain that music doesn't sound as good when compressed into MP3 format, I don't notice the difference. (It's true that music usually doesn't sound as good when I'm listening to it on my computer when compared to other sound-playing devices, but I think that's more because the computer speakers aren't as good.)
no subject
Date: 2007-06-10 03:25 am (UTC)I figured it was largely a neo-bohemian kind of thing. Not to mention that vinyl now has retro appeal.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-10 03:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-10 03:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-11 02:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-13 01:14 pm (UTC)Incidentally as old-fashioned as Victor Columbia Edison is by today's standards, he appears to be the only mechanical music-playing device in Oz. I have to wonder if there's some untold story as to how Dr. Pipt came by the phonograph. Maybe they're actually more common in Oz than we think, though.