The Name Game
Nov. 26th, 2006 07:19 pmSomething
bethje and I were looking at last night was this list of 1000 most popular names from last year. Beth was saying something about the name "Braiden," and I couldn't recall having heard it before. Not only does it appear on this list several times, though (as "Braiden," "Bradyn," "Braeden," and "Braedon"), but so do Jayden (for both genders), Jaden, Jaeden, Jaiden, Haden, Hayden, Caden, Caiden, Cayden, Kaeden, Kaiden, Kayden, Kaden, Aiden, Ayden, and Aden. I'm kind of surprised "Maiden" isn't there. It expresses the same basic sentiment as "Chastity," but doesn't sound quite as stupid.
And speaking of the name Chastity, number 811 for girls is "Chasity." Also appearing are "Gavyn" and "Madisyn." What, it's not bad enough that you named your kid one of these annoying yuppie names, but you can't even bother to use the correct spelling? Other names on there include "Jazmyn," "Zackery," "Alexzander," "Xzavier," and "Jaxson." Now, I could see a few people wanting to get creative with their spellings, but, well, these are the top 1000 names in the country! A Google search reveals that there were about 4.1 million babies born in the country last year. Combine that with the percentages given, and you'll come up with 615 babies born last year who were stuck with the name "Xzavier." Does that not seem crazy to you? Oh, and one other more personal note when it comes to crazy spellings is that I've occasionally seen people spell my own name "Nathen." I'd always think something like, "It's a really common name, and nobody spells it with an E!" So imagine my annoyance when I saw boys' name number 780.
Another irritating trend that I didn't really know about before looking at this is giving shortened versions of names as substitutes for the real thing. Now, there are some names (like, say, "Harry" or "Mark" or "Luke") that can be both real names and nicknames. But unless I missed a memo, this does not apply to "Jack," "Andy," "Steve," or (perhaps worst of all) "Billy." Come on, if you name your kid Billy, everyone is going to assume their name is William anyway. So why not just use the full version? Is this part of a general trend toward informality, or just plain stupidity?
And this has nothing to do with names, but I'd been meaning to write about it, and I don't have enough to say to merit an entire post, so I'll say that I've listened to The Soft Bulletin a few times now. This is only the third Flaming Lips album I've heard all the way through, and I think I like it better than At War with the Mystics, but not as much as Yoshimi Battles the Pink Robots. Songs on the album that I particularly like include "A Spoonful Weighs A Ton," "The Spiderbite Song," and "Waitin' For A Superman."
Okay, that's all for now. Stay tuned for reviews of the Fox Sunday night animated lineup, probably either later tonight or tomorrow. And my special pity goes out to any Braidens or Xzaviers who happen to be reading this.
And speaking of the name Chastity, number 811 for girls is "Chasity." Also appearing are "Gavyn" and "Madisyn." What, it's not bad enough that you named your kid one of these annoying yuppie names, but you can't even bother to use the correct spelling? Other names on there include "Jazmyn," "Zackery," "Alexzander," "Xzavier," and "Jaxson." Now, I could see a few people wanting to get creative with their spellings, but, well, these are the top 1000 names in the country! A Google search reveals that there were about 4.1 million babies born in the country last year. Combine that with the percentages given, and you'll come up with 615 babies born last year who were stuck with the name "Xzavier." Does that not seem crazy to you? Oh, and one other more personal note when it comes to crazy spellings is that I've occasionally seen people spell my own name "Nathen." I'd always think something like, "It's a really common name, and nobody spells it with an E!" So imagine my annoyance when I saw boys' name number 780.
Another irritating trend that I didn't really know about before looking at this is giving shortened versions of names as substitutes for the real thing. Now, there are some names (like, say, "Harry" or "Mark" or "Luke") that can be both real names and nicknames. But unless I missed a memo, this does not apply to "Jack," "Andy," "Steve," or (perhaps worst of all) "Billy." Come on, if you name your kid Billy, everyone is going to assume their name is William anyway. So why not just use the full version? Is this part of a general trend toward informality, or just plain stupidity?
And this has nothing to do with names, but I'd been meaning to write about it, and I don't have enough to say to merit an entire post, so I'll say that I've listened to The Soft Bulletin a few times now. This is only the third Flaming Lips album I've heard all the way through, and I think I like it better than At War with the Mystics, but not as much as Yoshimi Battles the Pink Robots. Songs on the album that I particularly like include "A Spoonful Weighs A Ton," "The Spiderbite Song," and "Waitin' For A Superman."
Okay, that's all for now. Stay tuned for reviews of the Fox Sunday night animated lineup, probably either later tonight or tomorrow. And my special pity goes out to any Braidens or Xzaviers who happen to be reading this.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-27 01:00 am (UTC)Or Dewis, but I suspect that big things are to come for that name.
Maybe the former got watered down by the other forms: Wallis, Wallyss, Walys, Wahlys, Wahliss, and Walyssa for the ladies.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-27 02:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-27 03:31 am (UTC)Also, I am kind of amused w/r/t Ben's comment on seeing a student named "Madysin" -- basically that the only career option open to her with that name is Stripper.
Also also, the interesting thing with that is that Madison didn't really exist as a girl's name until around, what, 1982, 1983, 1984? Whenever it was that Splash came out, and y'know, she called herself that after Madison Avenue.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-27 06:22 am (UTC)but the spelling thing is ridiculous. The only thing that's doing is deprving kids of finding those little personalized bike license plates. Hey, let's see how many Xs,Is,Zs,extra Ss, and other various letters we can cram into a name. I believe this is the 90s fault. Soon the generation after me is gonna grow up and be naming their kids "~*bRiTTliCIous**~~"
no subject
Date: 2006-11-27 01:02 pm (UTC)"In the 1950s, the top 10 names for boys and girls accounted for a quarter of all babies. Today, it's less than a tenth."
http://parenting.ivillage.com/pregnancy/pbabynames/0,,babynamewizard_83c61xk7,00.html
no subject
Date: 2006-11-27 09:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-27 09:59 pm (UTC)Since "Xavier" with the correct spelling is also up there, I don't think this is a typo. On the other hand, the correct spelling of "Chastity" ISN'T there, so "Chasity" could possibly be a typo.
Also, I am kind of amused w/r/t Ben's comment on seeing a student named "Madysin" -- basically that the only career option open to her with that name is Stripper.
Well, that's pretty much also true for "Amber."
Also also, the interesting thing with that is that Madison didn't really exist as a girl's name until around, what, 1982, 1983, 1984? Whenever it was that Splash came out, and y'know, she called herself that after Madison Avenue.
Yeah, if I remember the movie correctly (and yes, I'm aware that such is a severe waste of brain cells), it was presented as a name that a person wouldn't really have. So were people actually saying, "Hey, I think I'll name my kid after a mermaid in some movie!" If that's the case, were there a lot of Ariels born in 1989?
no subject
Date: 2006-11-27 10:04 pm (UTC)he only thing that's doing is deprving kids of finding those little personalized bike license plates.
Which is why I'm naming my kid Bort!
oon the generation after me is gonna grow up and be naming their kids "~*bRiTTliCIous**~~"
Or possibly just "Dude." I just hope they don't start adding a bunch of numbers, like with stupid people's AIM names. Then again, that might eliminate the need for social security numbers.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-27 10:04 pm (UTC)Why not Sesuj? Or Dog? {g}
no subject
Date: 2006-11-27 10:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-27 10:12 pm (UTC)So would you go with Esmerelda, or just Esmé?
no subject
Date: 2006-11-27 10:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-29 12:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-29 12:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-29 12:27 am (UTC)So my motherinlaw keeps trying to name my baby and I say "I like traditional names, nothing trendy," and she says "I agree," and then she keeps suggesting things like Aiden or Dylan or Tyler or Gavin and I'm like "NO! NO TRENDY!!!!" Which brings us back to the nicknames-for-real-names issue with the only name my husband likes, Max, which I don't like simply and only because it is all of a sudden popular when a few years ago it wasn't. But I also, incidentally, can't stand any of the longer names for it, like Maxwell or (god forbid) Maximilian or even more obscure stuff like Maxson or (my mom found in an article the other day) Maxfield (seriously, Maxfield?), so he would absolutely without a doubt have to be Just Max. Which I wouldn't mind, if there weren't all of a sudden so many other maxes. Granted, my top choice, James, is a BIT more popular, but at least it has ALWAYS been popular, and chances are always WILL be popular, so it isn't so... so FAD-LIKE. I mean, who are his parents to talk, though, Amy and Jason? No, we weren't born in the middle of the 1970s or anything. Though I suppose I could have been a Jennifer.
Also on the nicknames-for-real-names subject though, I think Jack has been a real name by itself for a long time though, and can probably at least join the ranks of Harry if not Mark and Luke as an acceptible stand-alone. Probably my brain is warped this way because by the time I realized Jack was a nickname for John, I already had a cousin named plain old Jack, so it's pretty well-ingrained. Although on the other hand I was surprised to discover that my Uncle Harry WAS just named Harry and not Harold, so go figure.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-29 12:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-29 12:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-29 02:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-29 03:06 pm (UTC)I think the problem with names like those, at least as far as I'm concerned, isn't even so much that they're trendy as that they're kind of...well, ugly. They sound more coarse than pleasant, and it doesn't help that they practically scream out "stuck-up yuppie." I think they appeal to people who decide what to name their kids the same way they decide what clothes to wear or food to eat, i.e., by doing what they think is In.
Beth has an uncle named Harry, which isn't short for anything. She also has an aunt named Cindy, which isn't short for anything, but I think that's much less common. And, of course, Harry Potter's name is just Harry (although I believe Harold Potter is the name of the villain in It's a Wonderful Life).
no subject
Date: 2006-11-29 09:56 pm (UTC)I remember that he's Mr. Potter, but don't remember his first name, but I don't think it's Harold, if only because George Bailey's brother is named Harry.
Yeah, go useless facts brain cells.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-29 11:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-29 11:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-29 11:53 pm (UTC)Oh, and getting back to an earlier comment of yours in this thread, there was a famous illustrator named Maxfield Parrish. He illustrated one of L. Frank Baum's early books (Mother Goose in Prose, I think?).
no subject
Date: 2006-11-30 11:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-02 07:32 am (UTC)