How apt that critics of a book that stresses the need for context ignore Loewen's own context.

This kind of thing goes along with my theory (and i say theory but really I'm just like...stating the obvious...) that Republicans (and other narrow minded, ignorant people) tend not to read/view all of what they're criticizing. Like all the religious fundamentalists that protested Dogma before even seeing the film.

Ohhh people. What are we going to do with you?